ELITES MOVE TO SACRIFICE CLINTONS JUST LIKE WEINSTEIN

MSM setting up downfall of Clintons to make persecution of Trump not seem political

 

Because the Clintons are guilty of the crimes the elites are accusing Trump of committing, it’s likely the criminal couple will soon suffer the same fate as Harvey Weinstein to make the persecution of Trump not seem “political.”

Already the mainstream media, which one year ago promoted Hillary Clinton as a “glowing goddess,” is slowly but surely publishing headlines linking the Clintons to the Russian Uranium One scandal.

This suggests that the globalists in control of mass media are fixing to dump the Clintons much like how Harvey Weinstein was burned, albeit the latter for sexual improprieties instead of political scandals.

Just look at this article from The Hilldemanding a “special counsel on Hillary Clinton’s Russia scandal:”

There was more than enough smoke for the FBI to investigate official government favors in exchange for big donations to the Clinton Foundation, but agents ran into a hyper-politicized Attorney General in Loretta Lynch, whose public integrity section said it ‘did not have enough evidence to move forward,’ according to Washington Post in October 2016.

Last week, blockbuster allegations surfaced in The Hill shedding light on what was happening inside the Obama administration and FBI while Russia was seeking control of massive amounts of our uranium supply. It turns out that the Obama administration inexplicably approved the uranium deal with Russia even though the FBI was investigating a massive corruption scheme that included bribery, extortion and other felonies involving Russia’s nuclear energy industry in the United States.

This level of accurate reporting, at the expense of the Clintons, is unprecedented for The Hill, which was once a major Clinton cheerleader.

Of course, accurate reporting has never been the mainstream media’s modus operandi.  So what’s the real gameplan here?

Easy: to sacrifice the Clintons to advance the anti-Trump agenda.

Remember, the power elites have no real loyalty to the Clintons. The Clintons served them, not the other way around, and now the crime duo is presenting a problem because the Clintons are guilty of just about everything they’re accusing Trump of doing.

So here’s what’s likely their next move: Burn the Clintons for their crimes to set a precedent to accuse Trump of similar criminality while claiming it isn’t politically motivated.

This is exactly what they did with the Weinstein scandal, and remember at one point the fallen producer was seen as “untouchable” just like the Clintons.

But will it work? Unlikely.

President Trump simply lacks the criminal nature of the Clintons, and the mainstream media lacks the influence to manipulate the public into believing otherwise.

This is one of the few plays the elites still have left, but considering that their playbook is obsolete, what difference at this point does it make?

https://www.infowars.com/elites-move-to-sacrifice-clintons-just-like-weinstein/

 

Advertisements

America’s Hamiltonian Empire of Lies

[titre article pour referencement]

In his essay, “Anatomy of the State,” Murray Rothbard wrote of how states preserve their power with a number of tools, most notably an alliance with “intellectuals.”  In return for power, positions, and pelf, the “intellectuals” work diligently to persuade “the majority” that “their government is good, wise and, at least, inevitable.”  This is the “the vital stock task of the intellecuals.”  The “molding of opinion” is what “the State most desperately needs” if it is to maintain is powers, wrote Rothbard.  The citizens themselves do not invent theories of the benevolent state; that is the job of the “intellectuals.”

In his outstanding new book, How Alexander Hamilton Screwed Up America(foreword by Ron Paul), historian Brion McClanahan explains with sterling scholarship how one “intellectual” in particular, Alexander Hamilton, invented out of whole cloth a mythical founding of the American state that bears no resemblance at all to the actual, historical founding.  His intellectual successors, most notably Supreme Court justices John Marshall, Joseph Story, and Hugo Black, cemented this myth of the benevolent, consolidated, monopolistic state through decades of legal opinions based on a mountain of lies.

This of course is exactly what John C. Calhoun observed during his time when he wrote in his 1850 Disquisition on Government that a written constitution would inevitably be “rewritten” by “the party of government” in a way that would neuter it as a source of limitations on governmental powers.

Hamilton has become “the new hero of the Left,” writes McClanahan, for the Left has finally realized that he was “the architect of modern big government in America,” something that many conservatives have long failed to realize.  Hamilton’s voluminous writings formed the bedrock for generations of legalistic arguments that perverted the Constitution and created the “insane modern leftist legal world.”  It was Hamilton and his ideological heirs who invented the “loose construction” and “implied powers” theories of the constitution, which has so “screwed up” America.

Brion McClanahan Best Price: $21.58 Buy New $17.72 (as of 03:40 EDT – Details)

McClanahan shows what a duplicitous liar Hamilton was, speaking out of both sides of his mouth, saying one thing in his Federalist Papers essays, and then spending the rest of his life doing exactly the opposite.  He defended states’ rights and federalism in these essays but when pressed by Jefferson and Madison, he “would often backtrack and advance positions he favored during the Philadelphia Convention, namely for a supreme central authority with virtually unlimited power, particularly for the executive branch.”  This was “the real Hamilton,” who “made a habit of lying when the need arose.”

It was Hamilton who first spread the outrageous, ahistorical lie that the states were never sovereign and that the Constitution was somehow ratified by “the whole people” and not by state conventions, as required by Article 7 of the Constitution itself.  It was Hamilton who Calhoun must have been thinking about when he warned of “intellecuals” reinterpreting the constitution in a way that would essentially destroy it.  Hamilton’s lifelong goal, as McClanahan demonstrates, was to subjugate the citizens of the states to the central government and render the states irrelevant and powerless.  The most Hamiltonian of all presidents, Abraham Lincoln, finally achieved this goal.

The Machiavellian Hamilton as Treasury Secretary assumed the state war debts as a means of creating a giant system of political patronage.  He put unemployed war veterans on the dole, thereby initiating the American welfare state.  He led an invasion of Pennsylvania with 15,000 conscripts to attempt to put down the Whiskey Rebellion.  Nothing came of his invasion since all the whiskey tax “rebels” were pardoned by George Washington.  Nevertheless, the invasion served Hamilton’s purpose of allowing him to denounce all resisters of state power as somehow being clones of the violent French Jacobins.

The subject of a national bank run by politicians out of the national capital was discussed at the constitutional convention and decisively rejected.  Hamilton rewrote that history, too, to make the case for the constitutionality of central banking. His worshipful disciple, Chief Justice John Marshall, would cement this idea into place in his McCullock v. Maryland decision.  Hamilton’s bogus arguments in favor of a central bank were “a turning point in American constitutional history” because that is where he invented the fantasy of “implied powers” of the Constitution.  Once this path was taken, the constitution had the potential of becoming nothing more than a rubber stamp of approval of anything the state ever wished to do, limited only by the imaginations of Hamiltonian members of the judiciary

John Marshall was a virtual intellectual clone of Hamilton who spoke favorably of federalism, but codified federal supremacy and “implied powers” in his Supreme Court decisions, described in clear-as-a-bell writing by McClanahan.

Even more destructive of constitutional liberty were the writings of that great Bostonian blowhard, Justice Joseph Story (“Marshall’s right-hand man”), whose Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, written while he was both a Supreme Court justice and a Harvard law professor, have exerted enormous influence on the American legal and political systems. Like Marshall and Hamilton, Story “suffered from historical amnesia” and “manufactured an image of the American founding and American government that did not match the historical record.”  He lied through his teeth, in other words, to advance the idea that the founding fathers created a consolidated, monopolistic, centralized state even more powerful and monopolistic than the British empire against which they had fought a war of secession.  His lies that the states were never sovereign, that the central government is “sovereign” in all matters, implied powers, and all the rest, were repeated by Abraham Lincoln, beginning with his first inaugural address, as he “justified” committing treason by levying war upon the Southern states (the exact definition of treason in Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution).  Hence, it is the Hamiltonian, nationalist myth, not Jeffersonian states’ rights and federalism, that made the “Civil War” inevitable.  All of this, McClanahan points out, was always thought to be necessary by generations of Hamiltonians if they were to ever implement their economic policy program that Hamilton himself labeled “the American System.”  This “system” of protectionist tariffs, central banking, corporate welfare, and a large public debt was anything but “American.”  It was the rotten, corrupt, British system known as “mercantilism” brought to America.

Then there is the twentieth-century Hamiltonian Justice Hugo Black, FDR’s favorite Ku Kluk Klansmen.  Nominated to the Supreme Court in 1937, Black had been a member of the KKK ever since the early 1920s.  He used his association with the KKK, and its “nationalist agenda” of ridding America of “immigrants, blacks, and Jews,” and its “anti-Catholic agenda,” to become prominent in Alabama politics.  His rabid support for FDR’s presidential bids won him a seat on the Supreme Court.

Hugo Black’s main demolition of constitutional liberty came in the form of his opinions regarding the “incorporation” of the Bill of Rights to include the states.  This was never intended by the founders, who said nothing in opposition to the state-sanctioned “official” religions that existed at the time, among other things.

Thanks to Hamiltonian Hugo, virtually every issue facing Americans today is a federal issue.  His “incorporation doctrine” was the final nail in the coffin of American federalism, as McClanahan explains.  This is why the federal judiciary claims “sovereignty” over almost everything, from same-sex marriage to “transgendger bathrooms,” all aspects of the welfare state – everything and anything.  This is Hamilton’s America – a leftist lawyereaucracy hell bent on imposing totalitarian rule on the rest of us.

Don’t waste your money on that stupid New York City play about “Hamilton.”  Spend a tiny fraction of that theater ticket money on How Alexander Hamilton Screwed Up America instead, and educate yourself and all of those around you about their real American history.

Source : www.lewrockwell.com

Urgent Message for Donald Trump

 

By Anna Von Reitz
This is an urgent message for US President Donald J. Trump:
Help is on the way.
What appears to be an insurmountable obstacle will melt away like morning mist.
You have been chosen to enter the vacated Office of President of the United States of America
(Unincorporated). We have seen your heart in your actions and we approve of the steps you have
taken to get the Ship of State back on course.
The so-called “New Republic” does not have a contract. Mr. Rothschild has been repeatedly rebuffed
and informed that we have made new arrangements and have new contracts with new federal
service providers in place following the attempt to vacate the federal obligations and commercial
service contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America.
The assistance that FRANCE has rendered as part of the transition to new vendors is appreciated, but
only approved on a month-by-month service for-hire basis.
This counter offer has been published widely and accepted, so there is no excuse for FRANCE to
continue making efforts or claims otherwise. The so-called New Republic may represent the failed
Territorial United States during its reorganization, but does not represent us.
Likewise, upon you acceptance of the Office of the President of the United States of America and
your return to your birthright political status, you will be fully indemnified and enabled to act in
concert with Michael Stephan Young to represent the interests of the Paramount Security Interest
Holders and Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES, INC. and the USA, Inc.
Our claims are in place and our Sovereign Letters Patent are recorded along with all the other
documentation and corrections of the Public Record needed to enforce the Will of the People and
their organic states.
You are not limited to be the President of a bankrupt Municipal or Territorial Government Services
Corporation. You have the Office of the President of the United States of America (unincorporated)
ready and waiting for your acceptance. Your indemnification bond will be sent to the treasury early
next week, and until then and in the interim you can shelter your office under the indemnification
bond of your birth state: AMRI00001 RA393427640US.
The United States of America is among the last standing land jurisdiction governments on Earth. It is
the only entity (now that the Holy See has abdicated) competent to sort out this Mess, to forgive
odious international debt, to restructure and exchange debts among nations, and to re-settle and revenue
the national governments owed to all the people on Earth.
As President of the unincorporated United States of America, you will be representing the interests
and security of the actual states and people, who are the Paramount Security Interest Holders and
Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES, INC. and the USA, Inc. and all their franchises, subsidiaries
and agencies.
This is a sacred calling in the universal sense, not to be undertaken lightly.
If you love your country, as we believe that you do, you are now enabled to occupy the land
jurisdiction office and to act as a faithful fiduciary and agent of the unincorporated United States of
America.
If Paul Ryan does assume office as President of the bankrupt Territorial United States, it should be
regarded as a private corporate issue and not as any transfer of power or delegated authority
affecting your public office as President of the United States of America upon your acceptance of the
duty owed by both of you to the actual states and people.
—————————-
See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

http://annavonreitz.com/

What Still Unites Us?

What Still Unites Us?

Decades ago, a debate over what kind of nation America is roiled the conservative movement.

Neocons claimed America was an “ideological nation” a “creedal nation,” dedicated to the proposition that “all men are created equal.”

Expropriating the biblical mandate, “Go forth and teach all nations!” they divinized democracy and made the conversion of mankind to the democratic faith their mission here on earth.

With his global crusade for democracy, George W. Bush bought into all this. Result: Ashes in our mouths and a series of foreign policy disasters, beginning with Afghanistan and Iraq.

Behind the Trumpian slogan “America First” lay a conviction that, with the Cold War over and the real ideological nation, the USSR, shattered into pieces along ethnic lines, it was time for America to come home.

Contra the neocons, traditionalists argued that, while America was uniquely great, the nation was united by faith, culture, language, history, heroes, holidays, mores, manners, customs and traditions. A common feature of Americans, black and white, was pride in belonging to a people that had achieved so much.

The insight attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville — “America is great because she is good, and if America ceases to be good, she will cease to be great” — was a belief shared by almost all.

What makes our future appear problematic is that what once united us now divides us. While Presidents Wilson and Truman declared us to be a “Christian nation,” Christianity has been purged from our public life and sheds believers every decade. Atheism and agnosticism are growing rapidly, especially among the young.

Traditional morality, grounded in Christianity, is being discarded. Half of all marriages end in divorce. Four-in-10 children are born out of wedlock. Unrestricted abortion and same-sex marriage — once regarded as marks of decadence and decline — are now seen as human rights and the hallmarks of social progress.

Tens of millions of us do not speak English. Where most of our music used to be classic, popular, country and western, and jazz, much of it now contains rutting lyrics that used to be unprintable.

Where we used to have three national networks, we have three 24-hour cable news channels and a thousand websites that reinforce our clashing beliefs on morality, culture, politics and race.

Consider but a few events post-Charlottesville.

“Murderer” was painted on the San Fernando statue of Fr. Junipero Serra, the Franciscan who founded the missions that became San Diego, San Francisco, San Juan Capistrano and Santa Clara.

America’s oldest monument honoring Columbus, in Baltimore, was vandalized. Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia called for Robert E. Lee’s statue to be removed from Capitol and replaced by — Pocahontas.

According to legend, this daughter of Chief Powhatan saved Captain John Smith from being beheaded by throwing herself across his neck. The Chief was a “person of interest” in the disappearance of the “Lost Colony” of Roanoke Island, among whose missing was Virginia Dare, the first European baby born in British America.

Why did Kaine not call for John Smith himself, leader of the Jamestown Colony that fought off Indian attacks, to be so honored?

In New Orleans, “Tear It Down” was spray-painted on a statue of Joan of Arc, a gift from France in 1972. Besides being a canonized saint in the Catholic Church and a legendary heroine of France, what did the Maid of Orleans do to deserve this?

Taken together, we are seeing the discoverers, explorers and missionaries of North America demonized as genocidal racists all. The Founding Fathers are either slave owners or sanctioners of slavery.

Our nation-builders either collaborated in or condoned the ethnic cleansing of Native Americans. Almost to the present, ours was a land where segregationists were honored leaders.

Bottom line for the left: Americans should be sickened and ashamed of the history that made us the world’s greatest nation. And we should acknowledge our ancestors’ guilt by tearing down any and all monuments and statues that memorialize them.

This rising segment of America, full of self-righteous rage, is determined to blacken the memory of those who have gone before us.

To another slice of America, much of the celebrated social and moral “progress” of recent decades induces a sense of nausea, summarized in the lament, “This isn’t the country we grew up in.”

Hillary Clinton famously described this segment of America as a “basket of deplorables … racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic … bigots,” and altogether “irredeemable.”

So, what still unites us? What holds us together into the indefinite future? What makes us one nation and one people? What do we offer mankind, as nations seem to recoil from what we are becoming, and are instead eager to build their futures on the basis of ethnonationalism and fundamentalist faith?

If advanced democracy has produced the disintegration of a nation that we see around us, what is the compelling case for it?

A sixth of the way through the 21st century, what is there to make us believe this will be the Second American Century?

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of a new book, “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.” To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators website at http://www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CREATORS.COM

Image

HIGHER EDUCATION

Inline image 1

Thinking for yourself —

via Thinking for yourself — NESARA- REPUBLIC NOW – GALACTIC NEWS

America’s Berlin Wall Moment

JcollinsAugust 18, 2017CulturalEconomicsFREEPOM

Predicting the Implosion of Western Culture

What is now happening in America was predicted back in 2014 in the post The Implosion of American Culture.   The pattern and trend of ideological unrest, and growing division between the political left and political right, has now taken on new dimensions of propaganda and violence.  The wedge has been driven so deep that it is difficult to ascertain whether workable solutions and compromises can be implemented before all out cultural war takes root and joins with other civil conflicts which are developing in Europe.

Back in December of 2014 I stated the following:

This implosion of culture can be seen in the recent racial and political divide which has been given focus in the riots and protests across the country.  The media is doing its part to push the CSI (Cultural and Socioeconomic Interception) engineering into the homes and minds of the disorganized masses.  Many speculate that the riots have failed to spread as desired, but I reckon that they were extremely successful in that they leveled up the tension and pre-prejudice for a continuation of the slow motion implosion and transition to the international mindset collective.

Reflecting back upon those words we can observe the obvious trend which has continued from that period.  The “slow motion implosion” continued for the last three years and experienced an increase in both desperation and intensity after the election of Donald Trump.

As I have written about extensively, the Trump campaign platform, and now political agenda, is promoting the policies and mechanisms which will shift the American hegemonic power from its traditional Anglo-American establishment orientation to a more aligned multilateral orientation which is based on the mandates of an ancient consortium of international banking interests.

The financial and monetary aspects of this transition have been well covered in hundreds of POM posts which have delved into the morphing architecture of the global institutions, and emerging alliances between those institutions, across the political and economic spectrums.  These predictions and supporting analysis have proved extremely accurate, and have served as the functional base of understanding, and decision making, for both POM readers and enterprises around the world, including non-Anglo-American think tanks, defense contractors, mining companies, and investment funds.

The focus and direction of POM has been to explain the intrinsic characteristics of the emerging multilateral framework with that of the receding hegemonic framework, while building an understanding and awareness about self-realization and the inherent human predisposition to corrupt all monetary systems and structures of governance.  Our talking points about the transformation of monetary structures and human consciousness are now appearing in the writing and analysis of others.

There is nothing more rewarding and flattering than the realization that our small corner of the internet has penetrated so far into the evolving nature of the right-minded man.  POM has quietly become the place to learn and reflect on the methodologies and mandates of this new world mindset.  There are so many who incorporate the information presented here into their own works and audiences.  It has not gone unnoticed, or unappreciated.

New POM readers can also reference the following posts for further confirmation and clarification of the pattern which we are discussing here:

 

 

The removal of historical statues and symbols represents the next phase of the re-shaping of America which will take place.  Both political parties will fragment and eventually champion the emergence of a new form of politics which will represent the merging of all previous ideological platforms and socioeconomic theories.

The fall of the Berlin Wall heralded a transformation which allowed the Anglo-American establishment to consolidate control and force a liberal-socialist and left-fascist agenda around the world and at home. But all transformations become the predecessor of future transformations, and the world is once again experiencing a period of enhanced transformation.

There is a power in this world which is far greater than that of the Anglo-American establishment.  Trump represents this power and will serve in the role as Pied Piper to both parent and child, as a New Town emerges from the burnt and fractured structure of the old.

As I stated in 2014:

“They will say no one saw it coming.  But there are those of us across the internet, on blogs just like this one, who have seen it coming and have been talking about it for a long time.  The exact details of every point of transition, and interception, are not easily discerned, but the overall macro trend is clear and there are a few moments of sudden adjustments coming.  The sad reality is that the disorganized masses will remain ignorant to the whole process as they become consumed with television news drama that hides the structural truth behind the engineered cultural implosion of the American identity.”

We are on the cusp of multiple and sudden adjustments.  – JC

JC Collins can be contacted at jcollins@philosophyofmetrics.com

This article is copyrighted by POM Media©2017. As non-Premium content it can be shared and reposted without further permission.

Please subscribe for Premium Content.