Monthly Archives: November 2013

And So It Begins: New York Sending Out Gun Confiscation Notices

 

Source: http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/11/robert-farago/begins-new-york-sending-gun-confiscation-notices/

By Robert Farago on November 27, 2013

 

(courtesy Mrgunsngear's Facebook page)

 

New York’s SAFE Act is a bad, bad thing. It requires people to register, sell or transfer (out of state) “assault rifles” and “high capacity” magazines. Many Empire State gun and standard capacity ammunition magazine owners have complied. Many have not. So, at some point, the State’s gonna go get ‘em. People on both sides of the law enforcement divide will die and the s will hit the fan. Meanwhile, there it is: the reason why expanded background checks, indeed all background checks and any type of registration, set the stage for confiscation. And tyranny. [ED: This notice was sent for New York City residents, based on New York City laws, not necessarily SAFE Act provisions.] [h/t DrVino]

A response to Judge Dale’s Post about the NDA

 

NOTE:  This is a post from John’s site (Thanks John) , I am posting the comments in order, under only a partial main post, since they appear more interesting and important.

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

hi John,

 
Retired Judge Dale has it wrong.
 
Direct Response to Retired Judge Dale’s Post Of November 26 2013 pertaining NDA (contract)
 
Who Can Enforce A Contract
 
Of course, contracting parties can enforce contracts between themselves, as can certain third-party beneficiaries. But, then the questions arise -who is a party to a contract, and what type of third-party beneficiary enjoys the right to enforce? How these questions are answered in practice is very important.
 
“If the first rule of medicine is ‘Do no harm,’ the first rule of contracting should be ‘Read the documents.”’ Villacreses v. Molinari, 132 Cal.ApPAth 1223, 1225 (2005). In Villacreses, the contracting parties agreed “‘to have neutral arbitration of all disputes to which it applies….”’But turns out-there was no “it.” “[T]he mysterious ‘it’…is intended to refer to an arbitration provision that the parties [did not put into the contract].” So, while it was lovely that the parties agreed to arbitrate everything to which their arbitration agreement applied, their arbitration agreement applied to nothing, because there was no arbitration agreement.
 
Likewise, it is not unusual to receive in discovery, or have attached to pleadings, unsigned, or partially signed “contracts.” And someone who does not sign the contract “is not a party to the contract,” Turner Gas Co. v. Workmen’s Camp. Appeals Bd. 47 Cal. App. 3d 286, 291-292 (1975). This questions the worth of unsigned or partially signed documents on the issue of who can enforce a contract. On the other hand, an unsigned contract or a contract signed by someone other than the party attempting to enforce a contract can be golden in that it can prove who cannot enforce that contract.
 
You can click on this link to read all of the original post:
 

7 comments:

  1. BLA-BLA-BLA -BLA This is bullshit. Put the N.D.A. together with the Patriot Act and you have confiscated funds period.

    ReplyDelete

     
     
  2. Impressive response but if I may ask, what planet do you live on? 
    Try to sell this to a Judge of a corporate administrative court that is part and parcel of the foreign corporate fascist government called the USA!  They will laugh you out of the court or lock you up! 
    You quote their corporate regulations and opinions of years gone by and that isn’t law and never was!  Its a game that was played on our minds and with our reality.  Sadly, I was once a part of it.  The real deals were made in the back rooms and the smoke is what you are quoting!  The more important you are the greater the justice!  That is a fact that you need to learn and accept! Blessings, Judge Dale. 

    ReplyDelete

     
     
  3. Thanks for publishing that rambling diatribe of legalese, as usual, an excellent tool of word manipulation for the purposes of distraction and legerdemain. Now I KNOW that Judge Dale is right on the money!

    ReplyDelete

     
     
  4. Judge Dale does not have it wrong. The truth is much simpler than the legal mumbo jumbo this writer spews forth: Once we’ve signed the NDA, they will simply say we violated it and ‘flatten’ our accounts and take our assets. Good luck to us trying to take them to court to get any of it back: We will have no money with which to mount a defense. AND the courts are owned by them.
    Have to wonder why this person wrote this. To show how much legaleze he knew about contracts? Problem is he apparently knows little about Homeland Security or the run-away government now in control.

    ReplyDelete

     
     
  5. Yes, I agree with all of you, it happened to me when I lost my home.  Try to justify that even.  Judge Dale is right, there is no way to fight them unless the Republic is once again restored and even then it may take time.  Who knows.  We were the slaves of the Annunaki way back when, and if we continue this way, they will once again reclaim their reign on this earth right before our eyes.

    ReplyDelete

     
     
  6. This is one technology that I would love to be able to use for myself. It’s definitely a cut above the rest and I can’t wait until my provider has it. Your insight was what I needed. Thanks

    ReplyDelete

     
     
  7. There are NO real “judges” exist since late 1780’s… Read the history.. Stop calling these pretenders/ actors from land of LaLaLa… dwon under.

    http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/11/retired-judge-dale-has-it-wrong-direct.html

If You Liked ObamaCare, You’ll Love ObamaCar

http://www.federalobserver.com/2013/11/18/if-you-liked-obamacare-youll-love-obamacar/#more-22310

 

In an effort to win back the hearts of the American People, the White House today announced its support of the new ObamaCar program.

“Too many Americans are driving substandard cars,” said White House Spokesperson Jay Carney during today’s press briefing. “In fact, there are a lot of Americans who don’t even have cars. That is why the President, by executive order, has initiated the ObamaCar Program.”

The new program will see that all Americans, regardless of age, place of residence, or occupation will be required to purchase a vehicle suitable to meet the standards mandated by ObamaCar.

However, Carney was quick to point out that this did not mean that anyone would be forced to give up their favorite ride.

“If you like the car you are driving now, you can keep your car. Period.” Carney read from a prepared statement by President Obama. “Nobody is going to take it away from you. Period.”

Carney said this means that nobody will be required to purchase a vehicle they do not want or need. Ever. As long as your current vehicle meets ObamaCar standard features, you can drive it as long as you like. Unless the manufacturer decides to recall it.

“But if that happens, don’t blame us,” Carney said. “That’s the free market at work, that’s capitalism, at least how we define capitalism, in action. We didn’t do that to you.”

He went on to state that all auto manufactures will be required to produce only ObamaCar-compliant vehicles.

The ObamaCar will come in two basic models:

The Sporty Runabout

ObamaCar_02and the Luxurious Executive Sedan

ObamaCar_03Both models come equipped with the following standard features:

  • Driver’s Seat Child Restraints
  • On-Board EPA Supervisor’s console and seat
  • Left Wheel Drive
  • Seating for Eight
  • Air Conditioning (preset to government-mandated 87 degrees summer, 41 degrees winter)
  • Gold Plated Power Window controls (Windows do not roll down, as drive through food is bad for you)
  • AM/FM Stereo with permanently docked iPod preloaded with President Obama’s speeches
  • Cruz Control
  • “NSAvigator” GPS Location System
  • Solar-Powered Headlights
  • Powerful 0.5 Liter engine capable of accelerating from 0 to 40 in three minutes flat
  • Lean Forward Design
  • Four Full-Size Spare Tires
  • Fully Enclosed Golf Bag Roof Pods transports up to four sets of clubs in weatherproof safety
  • Built-in Pet Carrier and Seating for Pet Valet
  • Glove Compartment Lobster Steamer
  • Eco-Friendly Burlap Seat Covers
  • Wilson Progressive 14-Point Passenger Restraint system
  • Handicap Access Doors and Chairlift
  • Fender-Mounted Teleprompters
  • Heads-Up Display Closed Captioning
  • 11,000-Page Owners Manual

Log on and order yours today at CarCare.gov!

ObamaCar. We Know What’s Good For You.

And Coming Soon: ObamaCycle!

ObamaHogSorry Osh – gotcha again – it’s S A T I R E ! !

Written by Ivan Betinov for the People’s Cube, November 12, 2013.

DAMN! Look what came in the back seat of MY ObamaCar!!!!

standard_equipFAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www. law. cornell. edu/uscode/17/107. shtml

http://www.federalobserver.com/2013/11/18/if-you-liked-obamacare-youll-love-obamacar/#more-22310

Judge Dale, Ret’d ~ Global Currency Reset And NDA Contract

http://shiftfrequency.com/judge-dale-global-currency-reset-and-nda-contract/

Guest Writer ShiftFrequency  November 25 2013

The Global Currency Reset may be a trap! So exercise good judgment.

At the outset of the Iraqi invasion, the World Bank and United Nations devalued the Iraqi Dinar based upon the petition of the US Attorney General. The Iraqi Dinar at that time was worth $3.22 USD. Today (November 25 2013) 1,000 dinars = 86 US cents or .86 USD.

Like many others I saw the potential for money to be made from the devaluation of the Iraqi dinar. This entailed investing in the foreign currency and waiting until it revalued. I then discovered that the Vietnam Dong had also been devalued during the Vietnam War, which was a long time ago. It never revalued.

I considered the fact the same situation could repeat itself regarding the Iraqi Dinar. I decided to take the gamble and invested a small amount in both currencies. I was tempted at times to invest more but decided not to.

As time went by I discovered the devaluation of the Iraqi Dinar was planned by the Secretary of the Treasury and Vice President and had nothing to do with the invasion of Iraq. It was about the Military Industrial Complex making another killing on a foreign investment off the backs, lives and misfortune of the Iraqi people.

The average member of the world public was not supposed to know about or be able to see through this plan. The Currency Exchanges were glad to have the business and even offered incentives to tell a friend. Dinar gurus suddenly emerged on the scene, encouraging readers to invest and get rich overnight. Unknown at the time was the fact that most of these gurus were connected to or were themselves currency brokers.

For years I had been telling family and friends that the United States government had become infiltrated by communists during the Wilson Administration and the entire federal system is a foreign corporate fascist group masquerading as the US government. Unsurprisingly, these statements of mine were regarded by family and friends as both unpatriotic and “conspiracy theory.” So I went in search of evidence and this is what I found.

What’s Behind The Global Currency Reset

The global currency reset for the United States is within one penny of kicking in. When it does kick in any US citizen wishing to exchange foreign currency at a Federal Reserve Bank, currency broker or currency exchange must agree to sign a 9-page Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). The NDA is a contract you are required to sign with this fascist corporate government to not disclose where your new-found wealth originated. This appears harmless enough except for the fact that the NDA is a contract signed under duress. Why duress? You do not have a choice to accept or not accept this contract. The corporate government is hoping that greed will cause you to accept its NDA, no questions asked.

You might think to yourself “They can’t do that. It’s unconstitutional” True enough. However as a US citizen and defined by law as an entity – a corporation – your corporate personhood has no rights except those granted to you by the government.

Some Background

The US Government is a private foreign corporation. Its existence is hidden behind the very Constitution that grants you the right to contract with whomever you choose. The NDA is a contract. The US corporate government requirement that you sign an NDA takes your contractual obligation to a whole new level. How does it do so? If you violate any provision of this particular NDA you will be arrested as a domestic terrorist under the National Security Act. This, in turn, alters what was formerly a civil contract into one that incorporates grave and serious criminal penalties.

You might be wondering who in their right mind would agree to sign such a contract? Well it turns out if you refuse to sign the NDA you will be denied your opportunity to exchange currencies at preferred rates, and you have only 30 days from receipt of the NDA to decide whether you wish to sign on the dotted line.

What isn’t stated is the 30-day limit is far more important to them than it is for the investor holding the dinar. The banks and US corporate government have major foreign oil contracts to fulfill, contracts they can no longer fulfill with the USD. They need your dinar to purchase oil now that Europe and other major trading partners are refusing to accept the fiat-based, ponzi-style USD.

Currency Exchanges

A currency exchange is traditionally a barter (equivalent value changing hands between private parties) and thus it is a non-taxable matter. However, this NDA contract requires you to agree to pay a Capital Gains Tax that has yet to be established. I’m hearing 10% but what happens if it turns out to be 50%? The currency brokers and wealth managers associated with the Federal Reserve banking establishment are recommending that you set aside 50% of your assets to cover taxes.

What do they know that we don’t?

The same NDA contract also requires that you agree to comply with any and all current and future laws during the next ten years, enacted by the corporate United States Government. This makes the NDA a noose placed around the signatory’s neck, then gradually tightened.

If you exchange your currency at a Federal Reserve bank you will only be allowed to exchange the equivalent of $10,000 in cash. You will be required to open one of the following:

  • checking account
  • savings account
  • trust account or
  • brokerage account

You will be forced to deposit the remainder of your assets into one of these accounts.

The corporate US Congress modified the US Banking laws this year to specify that all accounts – deposits, trusts, IRAs and safe deposit boxes – belong to the Federal Reserve bank. This means that once you execute a deposit you surrender all ownership of that deposit to the bank.  Should this foreign, privately-owned Federal Reserve system suddenly declare bankruptcy, all of your assets entrusted to them become their property. Within the fine print of all the banking accounts you own and/or open you will find the stipulation that the financial institution can use your assets to pay off the national debt, a debt that was never yours to begin with.

If you’re thinking the FDIC will reimburse you up to $250,000 on each account, think again. The FDIC filed bankruptcy in 2006 due to the swarm of bank failures that year, with claims against it in the trillions. The FDIC is done. Finished. It can never be revived without paying off those outstanding claims. I’m willing to bet your bank or wealth manager never informed you of that fact.

Your Money Is No Longer Under Your Control

Here is another “catch 22.” You cannot gift or wire any amount greater than $4,999.99 to a family member or friend without the Department of Homeland Security reviewing the check or wire transfer to investigate the origin of the money. Since you signed the NDA contract you cannot talk about the source of your money with anybody, even DHS. All of a sudden you’re turned into a suspect involved in a potentially unlawful financial activity.  Your gift will be confiscated unless you indicate Source Of Funds and if you do reveal the source you will have violated the NDA. This, in turn, can create the circumstance in which you are arrested as a domestic terrorist under the National Security Act.

The financial oligarchs may not be playing with the full deck but the cards they’re holding of a certainty belong to a stacked deck.

The Game Is Rigged

Did you know that Americans are now prohibited from transferring any assets out of the corporate United States without clearance from the Department of Homeland Security?  The reason for this crackdown has to do with the approximately four to 5,000 wealthy US Citizens who surrender their US Citizenship annually, transfer their assets and immigrate to another country. The government’s intent is to regulate the movement of money over national borders.

This is what is meant by the axiom “Finding yourself between a rock and a hard place.”

The Iraqi dinar currency exchange and its accompanying NDA is clearly a trap. The corporate US government is banking on the fact that you will agree to their terms in order to profit from your investment. However, if you make any financial moves in excess of $4,999 you will run afoul of DHS disclosure regulations. Given your signature on the NDA you won’t be able to disclose Source Of Funds and will likely end up in prison. How’s THAT for a rigged game?

One Legal Maneuver Is Still Available To Those Who Can Afford It

The only legal alternative that comes to mind that you can use to counter this madness is to purchase your freedom via Diplomatic Immunity. This relieves you of the burden of having to sign the NDA contract. I am certain that Diplomatic Immunity is still available to all and is honored in 90 plus countries. You will need to make this move carefully, however, as it is quite expensive to set up a Legal Expense (numbered) account with your bank or broker.

Given the costs involved in setting up a Legal Expense account (~$800,000+ USD) this likely will not work for the small investor. However, the fact remains there is no need for anyone to rush in to exchange anything. This 30-day limit is simply another fraud. They, the US Military Complex, need your dinar within 30 days to pay their oil contracts. If anything, at the end of the 30 days, the exchange rate will likely go higher due to the lack of confidence in the USD abroad.

I have a feeling (one I admit may be just a pipe-dream) that all this corruption enslaving humanity for millenia will be coming to an abrupt end in the near future. Once that happens our liberty as a species will be restored.

Blessings, Judge Dale

http://shiftfrequency.com/judge-dale-global-currency-reset-and-nda-contract/

FACT CHECK #78

WHITE HATS AUXILIARY and FACT CHECK CENTER

HELLO,

WE WOULD LIKE TO PAUSE FROM OUR REGULAR DUTIES OF SNOOPING OUT MYTHS AND LEGENDS FROM THE NESARA REALMS AND OKIE-RV-THEME PARKS.

WE LONG AGO TOLD YOU THAT THE INFORMATION FOUND HERE AT THIS BLOG WAS CLEARED FROM THE TOP AS BEING SPOT ON. THIS ARTICLE IS MOST IMPORTANT. IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON, AND SIFT THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF, JUST READ THIS AND LET IT SINK IN. 

http://canauzzie.blogspot.com/2013/11/a-new-path-forward-it-begins.html

WE HAVE NOTICED THAT IT HAS SPREAD PRETTY FAR ALREADY. SO, SPREAD IT AROUND SOME MORE.

REMEMBER HOW I TOLD YOU THAT WE WERE ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THIS ADVENTURE? NOW YOU KNOW THE DETAILS, TO THE EXTENT THAT IT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED SO FAR AT THE ABOVE BLOG.

UPDATE TO THE ABOVE:

http://canauzzie.blogspot.com/2013/11/news-flash-agenda.html

WOW, THINGS ARE GETTING EXCITING. I PRESUME THE NEGOTIATIONS CONTINUE. PUT ASIDE YOUR DINAR DECODER RINGS. STAY TUNED TO…

View original post 9 more words

When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces.

When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces.

As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the  United States Government does not have any employees They are paid by  the International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such  thing as the United States Government. In reality there are no  Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal  Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private  corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management  company. Guess what that makes you? If you said property, you are  correct! You are Human Capital. The shares that were issued for the  Federal Reserve when it was created back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain. To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12  U.S.C. 95, 18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public  Law 89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151  Public Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41  Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of  Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2)  (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting,  Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I.,  Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United  States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v.  LePatourel, 571 F2d 405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30, Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and  1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that  there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS  CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to do? Would you be lost? Could you govern yourself? Let’s see how things got this way. Between the 1860′s and the early 1900′s, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great  influence on the legislation being passed in the United States. Of  course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in  the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary  duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to  understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that  were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the  United States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty courts ‘did not interpret legislation as  broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts were  overstepping their jurisdiction. The people were in control because they knew who they were and where they were standing in relation to the  United States Corporation. In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its  books that facilitated the increase of subjects (the newly so-called  freed slaves from the Civil War) as property of the United States. The  14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens – United  States citizens that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th  Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or naturalized in the  United States. They had all been born or naturalized in one of the  several states. United States citizenship was a result of state  citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was  the beginning of the democracy first positioned in the District of  Columbia. The American people, in the republic to be found in the  several States, could choose to benefit as one of these new United  States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the  privilege to vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th Amendment. These  new citizen subjects were required to apply for marriage, registered to  vote, register births, deaths, etc. It all required was an application.  Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits, came  duties and responsibilities and liabilities, that were totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. (1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people  to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United  States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not is really irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to  decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated  with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the  American people had volunteered to participate in the United States  democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path was  provided for the control of the courts by the British Crown, with the  creation of the American Bar Association in 1913. In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act, opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations  otherwise mandated in the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every  contrived and created social, political, or financial emergency was  sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep  its peace time powers and implement volumes of “law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a declared emergency  in the United States and it’s States (administrative units), but it only applies to their subjects. In the 1920′s the States accelerated the push for mothers to  register their babies as first required upon the new federal property  – the so-called freed Black slaves. Life was good and people were not  paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market  crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take  their money out before they lost everything. In the 1930′s federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States  pushed for registration (surrender of ownership) of cars through  applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land  through registration of deeds of trust, which turned the land over to  the State. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the  people blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people’s attention off what  government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the American  people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States’ new  registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States subjects. The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive  registration (surrender) of property through United States agencies,  including the ‘State’ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and  its officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations. All of  this was done without full disclosure of the material facts that  accompanied each application for registration. Is that fraud? The fraud  was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with  treason, UNLESS a remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup  their property and collect for the damages they suffered as a result of  the fraud. If a remedy was available, and the people chose not to or  failed to use the remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people  struggled to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to  have the intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the  bills they were passing. That gave them plausible deniability. If the  people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States  had to honor it and release the registered property back to the people,  but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they  requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan. With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they  had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators  could act like they did not understand the people’s claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics, government, and history  classes out of approved politically correct text books also assured the  people would not find the remedy for a very long time. Passing new State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and  regulations, added another level of protection against the people  finding their remedy. The public ‘socialist media’ was molded to report  politically correct, though substantially incorrect news day after day,  until few people would even think there could be a remedy available to  them. The people could be separated from their money and their time to  pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to be lost in the  millions of pages of the books in huge law libraries across the country. So many people knew there was something wrong with all the conflicts in the laws with the “facts” taught in the government schools. How’ can  the American people be free and subject to a de-facto government’s whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would be  resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did! In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 and recorded it in the Congressional  Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal  Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for  the withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T.  McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of  Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the  Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933.  Mr. McFadden claimed on June 10, 1933:

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most  corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal  Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…”

HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the United States. For speaking like he did, Mr. McFadden was  poisoned by the powers that be by agents of that federal corporation. HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and  employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the  inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require  payment in gold. It also cancelled the clause in every contract written  prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in gold –  retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as  long as it was in use in the normal course of business in the United  States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to  discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States  provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt  instruments that could be passed on to a debtor’s creditors to discharge the debtor’s debts. That same currency, Federal Reserve Notes, is used  to discharge public debts. Take note; the Federal Reserve Notes have no  value, as stated by the Federal Reserve! In the 1950′s the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to  their States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures  for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial  transactions and fictions as though they were real. Security  instruments (commercial paper) replaced substance as collateral for  debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties, could be  used instead of money. Money (of exchange) and the need for money was  disappearing, and NEW money was being created i.e., ‘Money of Account’  (created by Bill of Exchange) and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the commercial venue and the courts to uphold the  security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance (see ‘Tender of Payment in your State statute!). All this was accomplished by the mid 1960′s. And by 1964,  most all the States had adopted the Uniform Commercial Code. The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and  required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must  follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled  thousands of years ago, but were refined and became more sophisticated  over the years. In the 1900′s the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law.  Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in  enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in their courts. If  the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they  tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be  successful. The principles expressed in the code combined the means of  dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well  for the people as they do for the deceivers. The rules do not respect  persons. Those who enticed the people to register (surrender) their property (land, cars, guns, children, etc.) to the sub-divisions (States) under  dictate by the United States, gained control of the substance through  the ‘registrations’ and the States were able to extract more ‘use’  taxes, from the people to use the property of the State! The States and  the United States became the Holder of the titles to all the property,  even children and many other things. The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing.  Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the  registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the owners of the ‘things.’  That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of paper  – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [Watch  the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.] Sometimes the fiction is made to look  very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is  an impossibility! The profits from all the registered things had to be put into a ‘constructive’ trust for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and  not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent  fraud. The profits for each owner could not be commingled. If the owner  failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a  constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from  the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the owner  failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for  learning the law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his  public person (Debtor-straw-man) by the United States. If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of “fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is  there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States  subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties – the  American people. The national debt is what is owed to the owners of the  registered things – the American people, as well as to other creditors! If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing,  and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to  discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the  people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the  accommodating party for a debtor-person. If the people are truly the  principle, then they know how to handle their financial and political  affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by his  actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has  taken on the debtor’s- liabilities without getting consideration in  exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not  have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor  person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a  choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor-person. The  presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for the  courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he  actually owns or owes. Debtors may have the ‘use’ of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In  addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for  every mistake the people make, when trying to use their remedy. Now the quasi-owner (user) of the property (thing), after  learning the law and discovering who he is in relation to the United  States Corporation, can file a UCC Financing Statement based upon a  Security Agreement, registering his security interest in the  artificial entity DEBTOR/PERSON, being the ENS LEGIS which the United  States created after your Mom signed the ‘Root of Title/Newborn  Identification’ and then was compelled to apply for a birth certificate. That was the act of registering her biological property, her baby  (substance), with the State of ____. The United States holds the paper  title (form), not the substance (baby). Until your Financing Statement  is filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter – JOHN HENRY DOE.  When John Henry Doe files the Financing Statement supported by a  Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner  (John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The  UCC and the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered security interest. It has priority over most other interest  claimed (only claimed) in the same thing. The evidence that is missing  in the court is the registered claim over the person (JOHN). The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own affairs in the future. That is done when you do the CHARGE BACK PROCESS by filing a Bill of  Exchange with the Secretary through which he ‘charges up the UCC  Contract Trust Account,’ in respect to the ‘value’ expressed on the  Birth Certificate and the ‘Directive’ cover letter. The social security  number, belonging to your Debtor, is the Trust Account Number for a  chargeback, for all the presumed charges brought against your Debtor for proper discharge. Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public person (JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting  benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You  cannot go into the public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no  power until it is charged with some energy. That energy comes from an  IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill, utility bill,  traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a $ amount and JOHN’S  name on it as the presumed debtor. The bill is the energy. It charges  the dead JOHN. You can now discharge JOHN and put JOHN’S accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as the secured  party creditor, having charged up the UCC Contract Trust Account, now  for the ‘presentment’ received in behalf of a debt owed by JOHN, you can discharge the fine, fee, tax or debt with a negotiable instrument for  the same $ amount as the charging instrument (presentment) stipulates.  The charging party that receives your non-cash item can process it back  through the United States Treasury through their financial institution.  Note; if discharging IRS Tax liability, the package/instrument goes  directly to the Secretary of Treasury – U.S. When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the  United States or one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts to you at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of the thing, but the United  States/States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not  specifically authorize the United States/State and its agents to invest  the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder. Legally, all the  profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered things  must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud. Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application  in the United States, which it is, the officers of the United States  could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided a  remedy, which they did. — House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933.  This is their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of  treason. That does not mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the courts will dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge of treason. But Tort, now that’s another matter! We  will discuss Tort Claims later!

 

Lt Zullo: Universe-Shattering Info In Obama Fraud (Video) All Washington Officials Sealed Jail Terms Unless Prosecute Obama.

 

The birther organisation wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com presented 300 Sheriff’s Kits to the governement officials inside Congress and the Senate on Nov. 18 and 19 during a 48-hour period. (100 Kits to a birther rally outside the White House on Nov. 19) They entered 100 of the government offices there. The Sheriff’s Kits are made up of Mike Zullo’s two-year “Joe Arpaio Cold Case Posse” investigation into Obama’s birth issue. I reported on this earlier.

Now, on Nov. 22, Mike Zullo himself is on live radio (video), announcing breakthrough news in the probe. The two events are related. It’s the news that’s the news here. Zullo is probably announcing his latest progress in the work. 

But Zullo visited Congress and the Senate himself last year, several times and announced he had made inroads there, particularly with Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX).

So Zullo, today is probably also announcing that his earlier visits have spun off a result. The wave of birthers on the Hill wouldn’t have happened without Zullo’s visits earlier. It’s the same movement. So, the pressure is mounting to an unprecedented level… Obamacare is already killing the Obama Presidency anyways. One thing leads to another, as often as not.

Thus things have now reached a tipping-point. This is the concrete way it’s happening and they’re (we’re) taking Obama down.

This wave of Sheriff’s Kits is swamping the government in Washington. It’s significant because the “Kits” that are out there, sitting in all these offices, being worked on, investigated and examined… in each damn office of the Senate and Congress halls… put the onus on all the officials to do their job: which is to serve justice and the truth.

Government officals have a duty to follow the truth and the law; that’s often forgotten and considered a detail… mostly they don’t do that though, and they just act upon partisan lines of “helping their own”. Lawlessness and Injustice are the reasons they’re in office. It’s a pity. Now they’ll be forced to act as if they obeyed the law.

Government officials can be jailed on not acting.

Steve Stockman for example, has been alone it seems, in dealing with the matter  of the birth issue. But this suddenly puts him out there up in front, with all eyes upon him from his collegues, who are suddenly just as informed about the case as himself.

Unless Stockman acts now or unless it’s the others who act, they’ll be guilty of “COMPLICITY OF CRIMES”. Other crimes they come under the description of are several: omission, accessory, aiding and abetting, etc… so what we now have is that at least 200 people have personally received Sheriff’s Kits inside the Senate and Congress buildings (in front of witnesses and who were filmed/photographed in each case) and they can all face steep criminal charges unless they act upon the facts presented to them by the Sheriff’s Kits which contain the facts of a criminal investigation; the Joe Arpaio Cold Case Posse.

This matter represents a career-threat to all of those officials because the law states that “Whoever is aware of a crime and doesn’t report it is guilty of ‘Complicity of crime’ and will face a prison time of twenty years emprisonment to life sentence and a $3 million fine.”

So let’s be clear again:

By having accepted the Sheriff’s Kits in their hands all the Washington officials have sealed their jail terms unless they act to prosecute Obama. Stockman is now in a quandary, because the national and international press are now watching him, but not just him, all the others too… who accepted the Sheriff’s Kits… are under scrutiny and none are spared. The first one to act upon the facts will save himself. He’ll be on the right side of History.

On the RIGHT SIDE of the LAW and of JUSTICE.

If Rep. Darrell Issa sets up a hearing, he’ll ask: ”When did you learn about the Obama birth issue and at what date did you get the ‘Sheriff’s Kit’ delivered to you?”

“When did you decide you’d close your eyes and cover it up?”

The same day they were giving out the Sheriff’s Kits inside Congress, birthers were rallying outside the White House. /obama/2013/11/impeach-zombies-pound-at-obamas-door-video-2458012.html

Click below for video and pictures:

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/11/lt-zullouniverse-shattering-info-in-obama-fraud-video-all-washington-officials-sealed-jail-terms-unless-prosecute-obama-2830570.html