Monthly Archives: March 2013

Wars for the benefit of bankers only.

Bank Wars – Everyone needs to see this!

 
Watch and forward as everyone needs to see this and learn from it.
This is a very important video… It tells exactly why we get into wars constantly and the
people need to boycott these wars and not let ANYONE be exploited by the BANKSTERS.  
 
Advertisements

BEST 7 MINUTES EVER HEARD ON SUBJECT of Gun Control.

Gun Control Nonsense – Firearms Prevent 800,000 to 2 million Murders a Year

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B5ELyG9V1SY

Warning, send it further

Please put out a piece that warns the people that the NWO is trying to co-op the White Hats reports by claiming that 2 guys, John and Geno are splitting off from the WH and printing their own blog. It is all disinfo. This needs to go viral.

 

Thanks

If Alan Greenspan Wants To ‘End The Fed’, Times Must Be Changing

Nathan Lewis            

Nathan Lewis, Contributor            

I write about monetary and tax policy for the 21st century.

 

For a long time, gold standard advocates in the United States have had differing viewpoints about whether a new gold standard system might take place with existing institutions, such as the Federal Reserve, or whether it would take place with new institutions, and the Federal Reserve would in effect be disbanded or rendered irrelevant.

During the 1980s or 1990s, it seemed politically impossible to even consider a situation in which the existing monetary plumbing would be torn out and replaced with some “free banking system” or other such solution. The Fed, under Greenspan and Volcker, seemed to have a pretty good handle on things. The economy was doing well and people were enjoying a Great Bull Market in both stocks and bonds. This was not the time when you throw everything overboard for some goofy new idea.

Instead, the notion then was that the Fed was, in effect, mimicking a gold standard anyway. The end effect of Volcker and Greenspan’s management was that the value of the dollar was stable vs. gold around $350/oz. during those decades. The argument was that this goal could be achieved in a far better way by simply linking the dollar’s value to gold directly, as was the case with the $35/oz. Bretton Woods parity of the 1950s and 1960s.

As Alan Greenspan said during his last talk before the House Financial Affairs Committee in July 2005:

“And, indeed, since the late ’70s, central bankers generally have behaved as though we were on the gold standard.”

Ridiculous? In July 2005, the value of the dollar vs. gold averaged $424/oz. In August 1987, when Greenspan arrived at the Fed, it averaged $450/oz. Point-to-point, over the eighteen years of Greenspan’s tenure, the result was just as if the U.S. was on a gold standard system. The problem was all the volatility and uncertainty in between. We just wanted Greenspan and the Fed to “behave as though we were on a gold standard” a little more rigorously.

Also, the gold standard advocates of the 1980s and 1990s were a pretty kooky bunch, pounding the table for all kinds of “100% pure gold standard system” notions that were honestly rather laughable, and unusable in practice. What they called a “gold standard” did not resemble any actual gold standard system in use in the previous two centuries. Among a more sober and sophisticated crowd, these people got the attention they deserved, namely: zero.

Today, however, the situation is different. The Federal Reserve seems to be ambling along a well-trod path to rampant currency debauchment. Historically, the currency manager in these situations is indeed replaced, whether the Reichsbank of 1920s Germany (replaced by the Rentenbank) or the U.S. Federal government-issued Continental Dollar, replaced by a free banking system and, in fact, a new Federal government.

Also, gold standard advocates these days seem to have outgrown some of their more imaginative (read: stupid) notions of past decades. I think more progress needs to be made here, but most proposals I see today are actually quite sensible at their core.

Let’s see what Alan Greenspan has been saying recently:

“We have at this particular stage a fiat money which is essentially money printed by a government and it’s usually a central bank which is authorized to do so. Some mechanism has got to be in place that restricts the amount of money which is produced, either a gold standard or a currency board, because unless you do that all of history suggest that inflation will take hold with very deleterious effects on economic activity… There are numbers of us, myself included, who strongly believe that we did very well in the 1870 to 1914 period with an international gold standard.”

In the same January 2011 interview, Greenspan apparently wondered out loud if we even require a central bank!

When Alan Greenspan starts to talk about “End the Fed,” things are changing.

Even those who thought that keeping the Fed was the politically most appropriate path would have probably concurred that a more ideal solution would be to replace it. Any country has potential problems with a monopoly currency issuer, and the Fed was a highly suspect institution from its inception in 1913.

Edward Griffin’s The Creature from Jekyll Island is an excellent account of how the Fed came into being. The fact that this 1994 book is, today, the #2 bestselling book in Amazon.com‘s Banks and Banking category, the #2 bestselling book in the Economic Policy and Development category, and the #4 bestselling book in the Economic Policy category, shows why crowds start chanting “End the Fed” wherever Ron Paul turns up, with no prompting from him.

In recent years, any attentive watcher has noticed that the Fed has been working rather closely with certain “Too Big to Fail” banks, in ways that are not necessarily in the public’s best interest. The fact that the Fed is likely heavily influenced by a certain well-known European banking family — a criticism that president Andrew Jackson applied to its predecessor the Second Bank of the United States, just before he killed it — is all the more reason to eliminate its influence in U.S. affairs.

As a member of the “keep the Fed” camp in prior years, it seems to me now that we will most likely come to that point, in not too many years, where replacing the Fed will be the best and even the easiest path.

We are not there yet. First, the Federal Reserve, and similar institutions worldwide, will have to make enough egregious mistakes that the public’s desire to expel them becomes unstoppable. This would be unpleasant, but as even mainstream Wall Street types conclude that the Fed is probably “locked in” to continuing debt monetization for the forseeable future, that now seems like a more and more probable outcome.

Besides, it’s plain embarrassing for Alan Greenspan to be out ahead of me on this issue.

End the Fed.

From Fortune magazine
http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanlewis/2013/03/14/if-alan-greenspan-wants-to-end-the-fed-times-must-be-changing/

Video Lesson From A Recent True Event: How To Fire And Indict The President, Jail The Bankers And Restore The Economy..

Video Lesson From A Recent True Event: How To Fire And Indict The President, Jail The Bankers And Restore The Economy..

 
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Video Lesson From A Recent True Event: How To Fire And Indict The President, Jail The Bankers And Restore The Economy..
Posted By: Watchman Date: Tuesday, 12-Mar-2013 21:57:51

 
Posted by John MacHaffie at 8:21 AM 0 comments

Fw: FYI — PUBLIC NOTICE Thursday, March 7, 2013 CANADA IS DISSOLVED

PUBLIC NOTICE
Thursday, March 7, 2013 CANADA IS DISSOLVEDA Legal Notice to all Agents of the so-called Crown of England and Elizabeth Windsor, and to all Canadians Issued by the Governing Council of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State
 
This PUBLIC NOTICE is issued to the Members of the Parliament of Canada, the Canadian judiciary, the governmental civil service, and the active serving members of all Canadian police and military forces, as well as to all citizens of Canada:

1. On February 25, 2013, a lawfully constituted Common Law Court of Justice found Elizabeth Windsor, Queen of England and Head of State of Canada and its churches, guilty as charged of Crimes against Humanity in Canada and of engaging in a Criminal Conspiracy to conceal Genocide. The same verdict found Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper guilty of the same offenses.
2. This verdict was based on irrefutable evidence, including eyewitness accounts of Elizabeth Windsor’s personal involvement in the forcible abduction and disappearance of ten children from the Kamloops Indian Residential School on October 10, 1964, while on a state visit to Canada. Ms. Windsor has never denied or refuted this charge or evidence, nor did she respond to a Public Summons issued by the Court.
3. The Court’s verdict rests upon the Nuremberg Legal Statutes of 1950 which allow any head of state to be tried for Crimes against Humanity, as well as the right under Canadian law to hold the Crown liable for tort offenses committed in Canada.
4. Elizabeth Windsor therefore stands condemned as a convicted felon. As a fugitive from justice, she is now liable for arrest and imprisonment under the terms of the Court verdict. A Citizens Arrest Warrant for the detention of Elizabeth Windsor was in fact issued by the Court on March 5, 2013, and Ms. Windsor has evaded this Warrant.
5. a) Each of you has taken a public oath of allegiance to Elizabeth Windsor as the Queen of England. Your oath now constitutes a criminal act under international law, including Section 25 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which obligates all citizens to refrain from colluding with authorities engaged in or convicted of criminal acts.
   b) Each of you is obligated therefore to refrain from aiding or abetting Elizabeth Windsor in evading justice or arrest, including by continuing to obey her orders or operating under her authority, since to do so will constitute an obstruction of justice and will make you subject to arrest.
6. Since no convicted felon can legitimately or legally serve as a head of state or a constituted authority, all existing legal and political authority in Canada is dissolved as of Monday, February 25, 2013. Your Oath of Allegiance to Queen Elizabeth and the Crown of England is consequently nullified and abolished, along with your authority.
7. a) Canada has been rendered as a state without legitimate legal or political authority. It will remain so until a new and lawful Head of State can be established along with a Constitution democratically established by the people of Canada.
   b) Until such constitutional authority is established, no existing Canadian law or statute is enforceable, and any attempt by you or others to do so will constitute an act of illegal assault and fraud on the people of Canada.
8. Until a legitimate government is established in Canada, all of its citizens are urged to conduct themselves under the common law requirement of peaceable co-existence and equity in their communities, maintaining law and order. All citizens are required to police and govern themselves without reference to any existing authorities or laws, which are nullified, illegitimate and inoperative.
9. Canadian citizens as wholly self-governing men and women are advised to establish local committees of correspondence to arrange a National Congress that will draft a new Constitution. This legal charter, ratified by a popular vote, will establish and maintain a new, Democratic Republic of Canada.
10. This Constitution must include a new legal framework by which the church organizations also convicted by the Court – the Vatican and Catholic, Anglican and United Church –  can legitimately and lawfully operate in Canada, if such further operation is the will of the People. In accordance with the Verdict of the Court and lawful legitimacy, this new framework would require a Civil Constitution for the Clergy that nationalizes the property and wealth of the convicted church corporations, and regulates their church officials and employees as licensed public servants.
We are informing the world of these facts and of the new regime now operating in Canada. This same Notice and condition applies to the government and people of England, to whom a separate Notice is being issued.
Copies of the Common Law Court’s Verdict and Citizens Arrest Warrant can be found at www.itccs.org – This Notice is issued globally in consultation with the Legal Commission of the ITCCS (Brussels-London-New York)
7 March, 2013
………………..

NOTICE

This Document can be used as a Legal Instrument by the signed Bearer to uphold his or her status as a freeborn man or woman in the territory of Canada who is not subject to any authority save as a Citizen of a democratically constituted Republic of Canada
_________________________ Signature of Citizen
___________________ Date

Issued and ratified ITCCS Central 7 March, 2013

See the evidence of Genocide in Canada and other crimes against the innocent at www.hiddennolonger.com and at the website of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at www.itccs.org .An International, multi-lingual ITCCS site can be found at: http://kevinannettinternational.blogspot.fr/And access the independent ITCCS video archive at: www.itccs.tv
Messages for Kevin Annett can be left at 250-591-4573 (Canada).

A people can value nothing greater than their own freedom and dignity, and must defend these with their last drop of blood. There is no duty as sacred and no higher law. The pernicious belief that one can secure these without conflict and by avoiding danger is both false and poisonous. Danger can only be met with virile courage joined with a calm and firm resolve and a clear conscience. These virtues alone form the true leaders of a people and bring into being the martial forces that can win the deepest and cherished dreams of humanity. – Karl von Clausewitz, 1831“The great only appear great because we are on our knees. Let us rise!” – Camille DesMoulins, French revolutionary, 1790“I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.”Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers WindElder, Crane Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba

SO, WHY DO YOU OBEY THE LAW WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE TO?

Thanks, Mark.

SO, WHY DO YOU OBEY THE LAW WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE TO?
 
Well, Just this past January, Lannie Brewer, the Chief Criminal Prostitutor under The Bank Ho, Holder over at the DOJ was recorded as saying that he thought the Banksters caught red handed committing fraud in the mortgage industry could not be prosecuted because of the damage it would do to the economy. (This was broadcast in a PBS Frontline documentary titled “The Untouchables” and can be viewed here… 
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/untouchables/  )   If you did not see this, I strongly urge you to not only watch it, but to pass it along to others.
 
So, now here we are today with a Senate Banking Committee Hearing where Elizabeth Warren (Senator from Mass.) can’t seem to get the answer to a simple question. “How much money does a bank have to launder for drug cartels before someone goes to jail”? (Keep in mind although there has been documented evidence and even admission by Banksters that they have also laundered money for Terrorist organizations including Al-Qaeda, Ms. Warren did not go there.) According to the record, HSBC has admitted to laundering $881 million and repeatedly ignoring sanctions and cease and desist orders from Treasury and OCC…but still not even a hearing for the Banksters?  But, get caught with an ounce of their product and you will almost certainly see some jail time and most definitely if it is a repeated offense… That is of course if you do not belong to the class above the law. I find it ironic, if not criminal that if one is caught with $2,000.00 worth of a substance that has been deemed “illegal”, someone goes to jail, but if you are a Big Bank and admit to laundering $881,000,000.00 for the producers of this product, you are not even compelled to show up for a hearing. Had enough of the dual class judicial system yet? If not, you will when they come for you or one of yours…… but by then it may be too late…..