On Sunday morning, November 5, 2017, another mass shooting occurred, this time during services at the First Baptist Church in the small, rural community of Sutherland Springs, Texas, not far from San Antonio. The shooter, 26-year-old Devin P. Kelley, appears to have had a grievance against his in-laws who belonged to the church and perhaps were expected to be in attendance. Thankfully, two local residents, one of them armed, stopped his rampage with gun fire and a car chase, which so far has left 26 dead and another 20 wounded. As investigators discover other details, we may know more of the motive of the shooter and the circumstances behind his actions. Nevertheless, it is not too early to learn lessons from this horrendous act.

The first lesson is that the first responders are not the police, firefighters, paramedics, disaster relief workers, or other government officials. The first responders are those at the scene of the event as it occurs, whether it is a shooting, hurricane, or other disaster. More often than not, they are the victims. After all, who are the first people at the scene of any crime if not the perpetrators and their intended victims? Therefore, as potential first responders, we must be prepared to deal with the unexpected actions of our fellow man and nature.

This brings us to the second lesson. In today’s environment, we must be armed and trained to defend ourselves, our families, and our neighbors. Whether the arms are weapons, food, water, generators, first aid training, etc., to survive a shooting or natural calamity, there is no excuse for not being prepared. It is incomprehensible that so many people in a rural Texas community, where firearms are as ubiquitous as automobiles, could attend church or any group function unarmed! The gunman apparently had plenty of time to change magazines several times, which would have made him vulnerable to an attack by one or more well armed worshipers. Apparently, the lesson of December 9th, 2007 at the New Life Church in Colorado Springs, CO, was not taken to heart. There, an armed man came on the church’s property and began shooting, killing two people and wounding others. What stopped him was an armed parishioner in the church, Jeanne Assam, who carried a concealed pistol.

The third lesson comes from the actions of the two citizens, Stephen Willeford, and Johnnie Langendorff. Willeford, a competitive shooter, saw what was happening, grabbed his rifle, exchanged fire with Kelley wounding and forcing him to drop his rifle, and run to his vehicle for a getaway. Willeford then jumped into Langendorff”s pickup truck, and the chase was on. By the time law enforcement arrived, Kelley’s car had run off the road and Willeford stood nearby with his rifle trained on the killer’s vehicle. Kelley was by then deceased. Both the shooter and Willeford used AR-15 semi-automatic rifles in their exchange of fire. Willeford did two things correctly: he owned a weapon that was capable of dealing with the situation and he knew how to use it. As Los Angeles police found out in the North Hollywood shootout of February 28, 1997, you must have comparable or superior weapons and training to those of your opponents. Willeford had a comparable weapon and superior training.

The fourth lesson is that gun control laws don’t keep your safe, though gun-control proponents would have you believe otherwise. Despite conviction by court-martial in 2012 for assaults on his spouse and step-child, which resulted in a year in a military prison and a bad conduct discharge in 2014, Kelley passed a background check to legally purchase the firearm used in the attack, and to work as a security guard. (Somehow, he didn’t qualify for a concealed carry permit in Texas!) Gun control laws give a false sense of security. To depend on them to keep you safe is foolish and could prove fatal. We would all do well to learn the lessons of the Sutherland Springs massacre.




The Crown of Camelot and the Questing Beast

Jcollins    October 21, 2017

Origins of the “Monolithic and Ruthless Conspiracy” and a Crown Made of Spirit

He would find love
He would never find peace
For he must go seeking
The Golden Fleece

Poem Jackie Kennedy wrote for John on their honeymoon.

Don’t let it be forgot, that once there was a spot, for one brief shining moment, that was known as Camelot”…..”there’ll be great Presidents again, but there’ll never be another Camelot again… It will never be that way again.

These words were spoken by Jackie Kennedy in an interview with Life Magazine after the assassination of her husband John F. Kennedy. The first half of the quote was taken from the Camelot musical by Lerner and Loewe.

Long-time readers will recall that we have made reference to the sameness of the Golden Fleece and the Holy Grail. Both represent the act of discovery and journey within each of us to complete the alchemical process of spiritual transmutation. Animal man is the base metal and beast, while the spiritually evolved man is the true gold.

Camelot is a reference to the location of King Arthur’s court. This location has never been revealed in any of the Grail legends. Arthur held court in Camelot and was on a quest to find the Holy Grail and bring eternal life back to his kingdom.

The connection between the Holy Grail and early Christianity is the fact that both were telling a story through different parables. Both represent the alchemical transmutation. Merlin was the wise old sage and alchemist, our higher spirit and teacher, who was attempting to reveal to Arthur the path of rightness. In different Grail legends Merlin battles, or banishes, the Great Dragon from Camelot. Like in the Bible, the Great Dragon gives the Beast its power over man.

The animal man is his own beast. The Great Dragon tempts the animal and material world to enslave the spirit, when it is spirit which is meant to empower the animal and the material world. When the Beast wins he wears the corrupted crown of materialism and enslaves the spiritual man within the animal. The Great Dragon tricks the Beast into a quest for the corrupt crown made of fools gold.

And this meanwhile there came Sir Palomides, the good knight, following the Questing Beast that had in shape a head like a serpent’s head, and a body like a leopard, buttocks like a lion, and footed like an hart; and in his body there was such a noise as it had been the noise of thirty couple of hounds questing, and such a noise that beast made wheresoever he went; and this beast evermore Sir Palomides followed, for it was called his quest. And right so as he followed this beast it came by Sir Tristram, and soon after came Palomides. And to brief this matter he smote down Sir Tristram and Sir Lamorak both with one spear; and so he departed after the beast Galtisant, that was called the Questing Beast; wherefore these two knights were passing wroth that Sir Palomides would not fight on foot with them. (On foot being the material world. – JC) Here men may understand that be of worship, that he was never formed that all times might stand, but sometime he was put to the worse by mal-fortune; and at sometime the worse knight put the better knight to a rebuke.”

This passage is from Chapter XII “How Sir Palomides Followed the Questing Beast” by Sir Thomas Malory in Le Morte D’Arthur, one of the latter grail quest stories. The “worse” knight and “better” knight analogy can be compared to the native legends of the two wolves which live within each of us. One wolf is bad and the other is good. They battle within us for dominance. The one who wins is the one which we feed the most.

The Questing Beast is the animalistic part of us which seeks material award in the form of fools gold and worldly power. The good knight must follow and track this Questing Beast within himself as it searches the world for its own spiritual destruction. The good knight must battle the bad knight within himself in order to transform the Questing Beast into the Quest for the Holy Grail, being the spiritual alchemical transmutation of man from the animal beast to the spiritual court of Camelot, and King with a Crown made of Spirit. At times the bad knight within will find alliance with bad knights outside himself who have allowed the Questing Beast to rein over the material world. This makes the good knights battle even more difficult as he now must resist the temptation of material power and dominance.

The knight beats the beast and wears the crown to becomes his own king, or the beast wears the crown and becomes king over the demoralized knight. We all have the strength within us to tame the Questing Beast and complete our alchemical transmutation at the end of our Grail Quest.

Camelot can never be found because it was never a real place in the material world. Nor was King Arthur. Like Christ, the stories are not meant to be literal and are best understood as parables and allegories. This is why the Roman Catholic Church, being an extension of the Crown Beast system, murdered and “tore out by the roots” all bloodlines and tribes of early Christians who taught that Christ was the symbolic story of how to complete the alchemical transmutation from animal man to spiritual man. The Church had to convince the masses of the literal interpretation of the Christ story so man would not spread the true method of spiritual evolution.

From the Cathars and up the Protestant Reformation, this symbolic truth is the greatest threat to the Catholic Church and the Crown Beast system. Those who attempt to keep this truth and eternal flame alive, are murdered and removed from positions of influence over the disorganized masses.

This was the great truth which the Knights Templar discovered in Jerusalem, as they were digging under Solomon’s Temple searching for the Holy Grail, and brought back to Europe. The seeds of the Protestant Reformation were planted by the Templars, and the Catholic Church and corrupt monarch crowns of Europe had to remove the threat. As we have covered, the Templars went underground and spread the philosophy of truth through such fronts as the House of Stuart and the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. The Stuarts spread the Scottish Rite throughout Europe, and along with Protestantism, created the greatest threat to the Crown Beast system since the Byzantine Empire.

The House of Stuart started with Robert the Bruce and his alliance with the Templars to win Scottish independence from England and the Crown Beast system. King Robert the II was the first monarch of the House of Stuart. This was followed by King Robert III.

Readers should reference the post The Crown Beast and the House of Stuart for additional information on the Stuart bloodline and its continuance into the modern world.

John F Kennedy was a troubled man who battled with human weakness. The first Monarch MK Ultra programmed kitten, Marylin Monroe, was used to tempt Kennedy through sexual weakness. Jackie Kennedy was correct in writing that he would never know peace. JFK was surrounded by the flames and flags of the Crown Beast system, but remained a threat because of his bloodline and ancestry.

Kennedy bloodlines goes back to Ireland with additional connections to Scotland. There were the Kennedy’s of Underwood, who were from Turnberry, Ayr, in the Ayrshire County in Scotland.  The history is fragmented, but the Scottish Kennedy’s go back to Sir James Kennedy, who married a woman named Mary. Mary was the daughter of King Robert III, second Monarch of the House of Stuart, and ancestor to both Princess Diana. The Kennedy family had both a Catholic side and a non-Catholic side. JFK was considered Catholic, but would never discuss it, and stated that his religion was not relevant to his Presidency.

There are connections being made between the Presidency of Donald Trump and the Presidency of John F. Kennedy. The obvious similarity is that both have been subjected to massive campaigns meant to drive a wedge between them and Russia. Russia, we have learned, of course, is the one place which has never successfully been conquered and controlled by the Crown Beast system.

Trump has Scottish roots on his mothers side, but there is no evidence which can connect his genealogy to that of the Stuarts. Two interesting pieces of information which can provide indirect evidence is that Trump has recently won a legal battle to reclaim the crest of his Scottish family. The crest uses a double-headed eagle. The second is that Eric Trump, son of President Donald Trump, opened a new golf course this past June. This golf course is located in Turnberry, Ayrshire, home of the Underwood Kennedy’s, and is called King Robert the Bruce Golf Course.

The evidence supporting our ongoing thesis and research into the Crown Beast system, and the use of the double-headed eagle by the forces of right-mindedness who battle the Beast, continues unabated. The more we the look, the more we find.

In closing this piece, we will revisit the words of John F. Kennedy which were spoken at the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961.

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumour is printed, no secret is revealed.”

Trump is set to allow the release of the classified material around the assassination of John F. Kennedy on October 26th. Should we consider this timing a coincidence? And consider that this Oct 31 is the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther nailing his proclamations to the door of a Catholic Church, which marked the official historical beginnings of the Protestant Reformation. There is so much more to share. – JC

JC Collins can be contacted at jcollins@philosophyofmetrics.com

This article is copyrighted by POM Media©2017. As non-Premium content it can be shared and reposted without further permission.



That other plot – to bring down Trump

Pat Buchanan: ‘The real indictment here is of the American political system.

author-image   PATRICK J. BUCHANAN About Email Archive
Well over a year after the FBI began investigating “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putin, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has brought in his first major indictment.

Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort has been charged with a series of crimes dating back years, though none is tied directly to President Donald Trump or 2016.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/that-other-plot-to-bring-down-trump/#PkJPXWPGLR2Rg91Z.99

With a leak to CNN that indictments were coming, Mueller’s office stole the weekend headlines. This blanketed the explosive news on a separate front, as the dots began to be connected on a bipartisan plot to bring down Trump that began two years ago.

And like “Murder of the Orient Express,” it seems almost everyone on the train had a hand in the plot.

The narrative begins in October 2015.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/that-other-plot-to-bring-down-trump/#PkJPXWPGLR2Rg91Z.99

Then it was that the Washington Free Beacon, a neocon website, engaged a firm of researchers called Fusion GPS to do deep dirt-diving into Trump’s personal and professional life – and take him out.

A spinoff of Bill Kristol’s The Weekly Standard, the Beacon is run by his son-in-law. And its Daddy Warbucks is the GOP oligarch and hedge-fund billionaire Paul Singer.

From October 2015 to May 2016, Fusion GPS dug up dirt for the neocons and never-Trumpers. By May, however, Trump had routed all rivals and was the certain Republican nominee.

So the Beacon bailed, and Fusion GPS found two new cash cows to finance its dirt-diving – the DNC and the Clinton campaign.

To keep the sordid business at arm’s length, both engaged the party’s law firm of Perkins Coie. Paid $12.4 million by the DNC and Clinton campaign, Perkins used part of this cash hoard to pay Fusion GPS.

Here is where it begins to get interesting.

In June 2016, Fusion GPS engaged a British spy, Christopher Steele, who had headed up the Russia desk at MI6, to ferret out any connections between Trump and Russia.

Steele began contacting old acquaintances in the FSB, the Russian intelligence service. And the Russians began to feed him astonishing dirt on Trump that could, if substantiated, kill his candidacy.

Among the allegations was that Trump had consorted with prostitutes at a Moscow hotel, that the Kremlin was blackmailing him, that there was provable collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

In memos from June to October 2016, Steele passed this on to Fusion GPS, which passed it on to major U.S. newspapers. But as the press was unable to verify it, they declined to publish it.

Steele’s final product, a 35-page dossier, has been described as full of “unsubstantiated and salacious allegations.”

Steele’s research, however, had also made its way to James Comey’s FBI, which was apparently so taken with it that the bureau considered paying Steele to continue his work.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/that-other-plot-to-bring-down-trump/#tFrt3C0VjcFc7UUI.99

About this “astonishing” development, columnist Byron York of the Washington Examiner quotes Sen. Chuck Grassley:

“The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises … questions about the FBI’s independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration’s use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends.”

The questions begin to pile up.

What was the FBI’s relationship with the British spy who was so wired into Russian intelligence?

Did the FBI use the information Steele dug up to expand its own investigation of Russia-Trump “collusion”? Did the FBI pass what Steele unearthed to the White House and the National Security Council?

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

Did the Obama administration use the information from the Steele dossier to justify unmasking the names of Trump officials who had been picked up on legitimate electronic intercepts?

In testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Clinton campaign chair John Podesta and DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz claimed they did not know that Perkins Coie had enlisted Fusion GPA or the British spy to dig up dirt on Trump.

Yet, when Podesta testified, the lawyer sitting beside him in the committee room was Marc Elias of Perkins Coie, who had engaged Fusion GPS and received the fruits of Steele’s undercover work.

Here one is tempted to cite Bismarck that, if you wish to enjoy politics or sausages, you should not inquire too closely how they are made.

Thus we have Free Beacon neocons, never-Trump Republicans, the Hillary Clinton campaign, the DNC, a British spy and comrades in Russian intelligence, and perhaps the FBI, all working with secret money and seedy individuals to destroy a candidate they could not defeat in a free election.

If future revelations demonstrate that this is what went down, it is not only the White House that has major problems.

If you wish to know why Americans detest politics and hate the “swamp” that has been made of their capital city, follow this story all the way to its inevitable end. It will be months of unfolding.

The real indictment here is of the American political system, and the true tragedy is the decline of the Old Republic.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/that-other-plot-to-bring-down-trump/#tFrt3C0VjcFc7UUI.99

Link to All JFK Assassination Files





Who can ?



MSM setting up downfall of Clintons to make persecution of Trump not seem political


Because the Clintons are guilty of the crimes the elites are accusing Trump of committing, it’s likely the criminal couple will soon suffer the same fate as Harvey Weinstein to make the persecution of Trump not seem “political.”

Already the mainstream media, which one year ago promoted Hillary Clinton as a “glowing goddess,” is slowly but surely publishing headlines linking the Clintons to the Russian Uranium One scandal.

This suggests that the globalists in control of mass media are fixing to dump the Clintons much like how Harvey Weinstein was burned, albeit the latter for sexual improprieties instead of political scandals.

Just look at this article from The Hilldemanding a “special counsel on Hillary Clinton’s Russia scandal:”

There was more than enough smoke for the FBI to investigate official government favors in exchange for big donations to the Clinton Foundation, but agents ran into a hyper-politicized Attorney General in Loretta Lynch, whose public integrity section said it ‘did not have enough evidence to move forward,’ according to Washington Post in October 2016.

Last week, blockbuster allegations surfaced in The Hill shedding light on what was happening inside the Obama administration and FBI while Russia was seeking control of massive amounts of our uranium supply. It turns out that the Obama administration inexplicably approved the uranium deal with Russia even though the FBI was investigating a massive corruption scheme that included bribery, extortion and other felonies involving Russia’s nuclear energy industry in the United States.

This level of accurate reporting, at the expense of the Clintons, is unprecedented for The Hill, which was once a major Clinton cheerleader.

Of course, accurate reporting has never been the mainstream media’s modus operandi.  So what’s the real gameplan here?

Easy: to sacrifice the Clintons to advance the anti-Trump agenda.

Remember, the power elites have no real loyalty to the Clintons. The Clintons served them, not the other way around, and now the crime duo is presenting a problem because the Clintons are guilty of just about everything they’re accusing Trump of doing.

So here’s what’s likely their next move: Burn the Clintons for their crimes to set a precedent to accuse Trump of similar criminality while claiming it isn’t politically motivated.

This is exactly what they did with the Weinstein scandal, and remember at one point the fallen producer was seen as “untouchable” just like the Clintons.

But will it work? Unlikely.

President Trump simply lacks the criminal nature of the Clintons, and the mainstream media lacks the influence to manipulate the public into believing otherwise.

This is one of the few plays the elites still have left, but considering that their playbook is obsolete, what difference at this point does it make?



America’s Hamiltonian Empire of Lies

[titre article pour referencement]

In his essay, “Anatomy of the State,” Murray Rothbard wrote of how states preserve their power with a number of tools, most notably an alliance with “intellectuals.”  In return for power, positions, and pelf, the “intellectuals” work diligently to persuade “the majority” that “their government is good, wise and, at least, inevitable.”  This is the “the vital stock task of the intellecuals.”  The “molding of opinion” is what “the State most desperately needs” if it is to maintain is powers, wrote Rothbard.  The citizens themselves do not invent theories of the benevolent state; that is the job of the “intellectuals.”

In his outstanding new book, How Alexander Hamilton Screwed Up America(foreword by Ron Paul), historian Brion McClanahan explains with sterling scholarship how one “intellectual” in particular, Alexander Hamilton, invented out of whole cloth a mythical founding of the American state that bears no resemblance at all to the actual, historical founding.  His intellectual successors, most notably Supreme Court justices John Marshall, Joseph Story, and Hugo Black, cemented this myth of the benevolent, consolidated, monopolistic state through decades of legal opinions based on a mountain of lies.

This of course is exactly what John C. Calhoun observed during his time when he wrote in his 1850 Disquisition on Government that a written constitution would inevitably be “rewritten” by “the party of government” in a way that would neuter it as a source of limitations on governmental powers.

Hamilton has become “the new hero of the Left,” writes McClanahan, for the Left has finally realized that he was “the architect of modern big government in America,” something that many conservatives have long failed to realize.  Hamilton’s voluminous writings formed the bedrock for generations of legalistic arguments that perverted the Constitution and created the “insane modern leftist legal world.”  It was Hamilton and his ideological heirs who invented the “loose construction” and “implied powers” theories of the constitution, which has so “screwed up” America.

Brion McClanahan Best Price: $21.58 Buy New $17.72 (as of 03:40 EDT – Details)

McClanahan shows what a duplicitous liar Hamilton was, speaking out of both sides of his mouth, saying one thing in his Federalist Papers essays, and then spending the rest of his life doing exactly the opposite.  He defended states’ rights and federalism in these essays but when pressed by Jefferson and Madison, he “would often backtrack and advance positions he favored during the Philadelphia Convention, namely for a supreme central authority with virtually unlimited power, particularly for the executive branch.”  This was “the real Hamilton,” who “made a habit of lying when the need arose.”

It was Hamilton who first spread the outrageous, ahistorical lie that the states were never sovereign and that the Constitution was somehow ratified by “the whole people” and not by state conventions, as required by Article 7 of the Constitution itself.  It was Hamilton who Calhoun must have been thinking about when he warned of “intellecuals” reinterpreting the constitution in a way that would essentially destroy it.  Hamilton’s lifelong goal, as McClanahan demonstrates, was to subjugate the citizens of the states to the central government and render the states irrelevant and powerless.  The most Hamiltonian of all presidents, Abraham Lincoln, finally achieved this goal.

The Machiavellian Hamilton as Treasury Secretary assumed the state war debts as a means of creating a giant system of political patronage.  He put unemployed war veterans on the dole, thereby initiating the American welfare state.  He led an invasion of Pennsylvania with 15,000 conscripts to attempt to put down the Whiskey Rebellion.  Nothing came of his invasion since all the whiskey tax “rebels” were pardoned by George Washington.  Nevertheless, the invasion served Hamilton’s purpose of allowing him to denounce all resisters of state power as somehow being clones of the violent French Jacobins.

The subject of a national bank run by politicians out of the national capital was discussed at the constitutional convention and decisively rejected.  Hamilton rewrote that history, too, to make the case for the constitutionality of central banking. His worshipful disciple, Chief Justice John Marshall, would cement this idea into place in his McCullock v. Maryland decision.  Hamilton’s bogus arguments in favor of a central bank were “a turning point in American constitutional history” because that is where he invented the fantasy of “implied powers” of the Constitution.  Once this path was taken, the constitution had the potential of becoming nothing more than a rubber stamp of approval of anything the state ever wished to do, limited only by the imaginations of Hamiltonian members of the judiciary

John Marshall was a virtual intellectual clone of Hamilton who spoke favorably of federalism, but codified federal supremacy and “implied powers” in his Supreme Court decisions, described in clear-as-a-bell writing by McClanahan.

Even more destructive of constitutional liberty were the writings of that great Bostonian blowhard, Justice Joseph Story (“Marshall’s right-hand man”), whose Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, written while he was both a Supreme Court justice and a Harvard law professor, have exerted enormous influence on the American legal and political systems. Like Marshall and Hamilton, Story “suffered from historical amnesia” and “manufactured an image of the American founding and American government that did not match the historical record.”  He lied through his teeth, in other words, to advance the idea that the founding fathers created a consolidated, monopolistic, centralized state even more powerful and monopolistic than the British empire against which they had fought a war of secession.  His lies that the states were never sovereign, that the central government is “sovereign” in all matters, implied powers, and all the rest, were repeated by Abraham Lincoln, beginning with his first inaugural address, as he “justified” committing treason by levying war upon the Southern states (the exact definition of treason in Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution).  Hence, it is the Hamiltonian, nationalist myth, not Jeffersonian states’ rights and federalism, that made the “Civil War” inevitable.  All of this, McClanahan points out, was always thought to be necessary by generations of Hamiltonians if they were to ever implement their economic policy program that Hamilton himself labeled “the American System.”  This “system” of protectionist tariffs, central banking, corporate welfare, and a large public debt was anything but “American.”  It was the rotten, corrupt, British system known as “mercantilism” brought to America.

Then there is the twentieth-century Hamiltonian Justice Hugo Black, FDR’s favorite Ku Kluk Klansmen.  Nominated to the Supreme Court in 1937, Black had been a member of the KKK ever since the early 1920s.  He used his association with the KKK, and its “nationalist agenda” of ridding America of “immigrants, blacks, and Jews,” and its “anti-Catholic agenda,” to become prominent in Alabama politics.  His rabid support for FDR’s presidential bids won him a seat on the Supreme Court.

Hugo Black’s main demolition of constitutional liberty came in the form of his opinions regarding the “incorporation” of the Bill of Rights to include the states.  This was never intended by the founders, who said nothing in opposition to the state-sanctioned “official” religions that existed at the time, among other things.

Thanks to Hamiltonian Hugo, virtually every issue facing Americans today is a federal issue.  His “incorporation doctrine” was the final nail in the coffin of American federalism, as McClanahan explains.  This is why the federal judiciary claims “sovereignty” over almost everything, from same-sex marriage to “transgendger bathrooms,” all aspects of the welfare state – everything and anything.  This is Hamilton’s America – a leftist lawyereaucracy hell bent on imposing totalitarian rule on the rest of us.

Don’t waste your money on that stupid New York City play about “Hamilton.”  Spend a tiny fraction of that theater ticket money on How Alexander Hamilton Screwed Up America instead, and educate yourself and all of those around you about their real American history.

Source : www.lewrockwell.com