FBI Source: We Failed America, Revealing Clinton Emails en mass Would Bring Down US government!


“There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down”, stated an FBI source, “My opinion is that the entire government is guilty of treason.  If leaking data en mass destroys my country, we betray the country. If we do nothing, we betray the country”  An FBI source, as part of the Clinton Email scandal investigation, purportedly took to a deep anonymous website to reveal shocking information about the findings of their investigation. The FBI source details the turmoil they faced in the magnitude of what was discovered.

The key breakthrough on the severity of how big this scandal is started from the recovery of files from the Benghazi computer hard drives. It all led back to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI source posted this information over a period of time, on a deep anonymous website, before the FBI’s decision to nix recommending an indictment to the DOJ. To date, all of the events that have transpired have been validating what this FBI source revealed in the blog postings………snip……

FBI post 3- “The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server.

George Soros was implicated by the FBI source as being a linchpin to the purported widespread corruption……snip…..

FBI post 2- “She had SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war.”

[NOTE: A Special Access Program is a highly classified intelligence program, usually Above Top Secret, including black programs. Many layers of protective access, such as isolated physical locations, and several layers of security are used to protect such highly classified information. Commonly, only need-to-know access is granted to a select few.]

FBI post 4- “My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason, which is why HRC’s [blank] would not cease the investigation or prevent further scandals. Many, many people are involved.”

To date, since the original FBI source’s postings, all of the recent and ongoing series of email leaks have been prophetic to what the FBI source had posted.  With that, it should be important for Americans to be cognizant of this information so they may decide and see through any actions that are unfolding.

Click below for at least 18 interesting postings by FBI:

FBI Source: We Failed America, Revealing Clinton Emails en mass Would Bring Down US government!




Isn’t it funny……”as the world turns”

When I was a young boy and we moved from Russian border to “America”, about 50 years ago, my father told me: “We are moving to America because it will be the last one to fall”. It is truly ironic that today I get to hear this, of all people, from a Russian leader as I am living the fall. 

Putin Socialism


Update: Time to End the Civil War: the Necessity of Expatriation

by Anna Von Reitz  Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Good morning, Campers.

As in, Internment Camp.
Because that is where you are and where you have always been.
I am republishing here the entire complete text of research on what really happened at the end of the Civil War—- and I want everyone reading this to note that there was never a formal Peace Treaty ending the Civil War, just declarations by President Johnson proclaiming peace on the land jurisdiction.  (See below.)
It’s time to force Congress to sign an official Peace Treaty ending the American Civil War more than a 150 years after it actually ended, because this is their excuse for all the crappola that they have perpetuated against us.
Now please read the well-researched facts and realize that these vermin long ago used their successful abuse of the Southern States as an excuse to abuse the Northern States as well.  Read and share:
Research Compiled by Geoffrey Jacob Caputo for State Nationals Association
I. Constitutionally Repugnant Reconstruction Acts Impose 14th Amendment via Martial Law Powers In Time of Peace
1861 –The object of the Civil from 1861 to 1865 was not for the Southern States to be conquered or subjugated.1
1865 January 31 – 13th Amendment Proposed to the States
May 10 – President Johnson Proclaimed the end of the Hostilities on land with the only duty left to arrest the former insurgency’s vessels at sea.2
February 9 – Virginia ; February 17 – Louisiana, April 7 – Tennessee ; April 14 – Arkansas,November 13 -South Carolina , December 2 – Alabama, December 4 – North Carolina
December 4 – Renegade members of the 39th Congress, at the inception of the 1st session on, 1865; suggested the denial of seats in the House and the Senate to the Southern States on the baseless allegation that they had no legal governments and were in rebellion. 3
December 6 – Georgia ratifies 13th Amendment
December 18 – 13th Amendment was declared ratified 4
December 28 – Florida (Florida again ratified on June 9, 1868, upon its adoption of a new constitution )
March 3 – 39th Congress resolves the denial of seats in the House and the Senate to the Southern States in the house on baseless allegations of rebellion.5
April 2 – President Johnson proclaimed the insurrection at an end in all the Southern States except It was further proclaimed that each State’s civil authority was to be restored and that they had shown sufficientevidence of loyalty to the Union by conforming to Johnson’s policies of incorporating the 13thamendment into legislation.6
June 16 – 14th Amendment (called Article XIV) was proposed by the 39th Congress Ist session by joint resolution 48 to “the legislatures of the several States” .7
August 20 – President Johnson further proclaimed Peace on and gave notice of the resumption of civil government in the States which had seceded. 8
October 1866 to 1867 – Southern and non-southern States reject 14th Amndmt. – Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Louisiana Mississippi, and many non southern states.
February 8 – One month before the first Reconstruction Act was colorably implemented, the 39thCongress introduced Bill 1143 entitled, “A Bill To establish an additional article of war for the more complete suppression of the insurrection against the United States”. 9
March 2 – First Reconstruction Act colorably “enacted”10 ; President Johnson Vetoes The Act11
March 23 – Second Reconstruction Act 12 ; President Johnson Vetoes The Act13
July 19 – Third Reconstruction Act14 ; President Johnson Vetoes The Act15
March 11 – Fourth Reconstruction Act16
June 25 – North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida are colorably “re-admitted” back into the Union as a new body politic of a 14th Amendment citizentry due to adopting the 14th Amendment. 17
July 9, 1868 – 14th Amendment COLORABLY IMPOSED due to 28 states’ alleged ratification.
II. Constitutional Violations of the 39th & 40th Congresses in Imposing The Reconstruction Acts & Amend(ment) XIV:
1 House Journal – July 22, 1861. p.123 / Senate Journal – July 25, 1861.p.92
2 13 STAT 757 Presidential Proclamation 35
3 Senate Journal, starting @ p. 7
4 13 STAT. 774
5 House Journal, March 3, 1866. Page 353
614 STAT 811 – 813
7 14 STAT 358
8 14 STAT 814
9 Committee on Reconstruction Bill 1143
10 14 Stat. 428
11 House Journal March 2, 1867 – Page 563
12 15 Stat. 2
13 House Journal March 23, 1867 – Page 99
14 15 Stat. 14
15 House Journal July 19, 1867 – Page 171
16 15 STAT 41
17 15 STAT 73
1. Art. V § 5 of The Constitution of The United States of America (CFUSA) “and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.”
Violation: The House Journal, March 3, 1866 – Page 353
1. Art. III § 3 CFUSA says, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort”
Violation: The Reconstruction Acts
1. The Reconstruction Acts were inconsistent with criteria for martial law provisions as required in The Constitution for the United States of America. See EX PARTE MILLIGAN 71 US 2 (1866)
39th Congress had no evidence of the states being in rebellion. Civil authority was restored in that the courts of the Southern States were open and the slaves were free pursuant to the 13th Amendment.
The only Martial Rule which can exist during times of peace according to the Constitution is the code of laws enacted by Congress for the government of the national forces in which martial law could only apply to the soldier and not to the citizen, then the Reconstruction acts were unconstitutional because it applied military law only to the citizen and not to the soldier.
1. Art. I §. 9 cl. 3 CFUSA: says “ No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”
Violation: Everyone in the southern states was, in a blanket fashion, declared guilty of rebellion and penalized via unlawful military rule.
1. Art. IV §. 4 CFUSA says “ The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
Violation: The 39th Congress unlawfully denied the Southern States a republican form of government by acting contrary to Art. IV §. 4
1. Art. 1 §. 8 cl.17 CFUSA that the Congress is “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dockyards and other needful Buildings . . .”
Violation: The 39th Congress exercised exclusive legislation (Reconstruction Acts) outside their District unlawfully.
1. Art IV § 3 says that, “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.”
Violation: The 39th Congress formed a new unlawful, defacto state within each of the several dejure states without the consent of the Dejure state bodies politic.
Additional Notes
DE JURE. Rightfully; lawfully; by legal title. Contrasted with de facto 4 Bla. Com. 77
How a Dejure state, such as Florida, is formed:
[5 Stat. 742.] Statute II. Chap. XLVII.– An Act for the admission of the states of Iowa and Florida into the Union . . . whereas, the people of the Territory of Florida did, in like manner, by their delegates, on the eleventh day of January, eighteen hundred and thirty-nine, form for themselves a constitution and State government [Act of March 3, 1845, ch. 75 and ch 76.], both of which said constitutions are republican; and said conventions having asked the admission of their respective Territories into the Union as States, on equal footing with the original States: Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled , That the States of Iowa and Florida be, and the same are hereby, declared to be States of the United States of America, and are hereby admitted into the Union on equal footing with the original States, in all respects whatsoever.
Florida’s original government could only be abolished by the consent of the people:
Florida Constitution of 1838 Article I Section 2 : That all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and established for their benefit; and, therefore, they have, at all times, an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter or abolish their form of government, in such manner as they may deem expedient.
The Reconstruction Acts were constitutionally repugnant war powers which abolished The Southern States’ original governments against their consent and formed a new state/nation/body politic composed of “14th Amendment U.S. Citizens”
15 STAT 73 (June 25, 1868) says , “WHEREAS the people of North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida have, in pursuance of the provisions of an act entitled `An act for the more efficient government of the rebel States,’ passed March 2nd, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven, and the acts supplementary thereto [see note 4, post], framed constitutions ofState government which are republican, and have adopted said constitutions by large majorities of the votes [363 U.S. 121, 136] cast at the elections held for the ratification or rejection of the same: Therefore, “Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That each of the States of North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida, shall be entitled and admitted to representation in Congress as a State of the Union when the legislature of such State shall have duly ratified the amendment to the Constitution of the United States proposed by theThirty-ninth Congress, and known as Article fourteen upon the following fundamental conditions . . .”
De facto government: One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof. Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504.
Wortham v. Walker, 133 Tex. 255, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1145
As a result, NEW DEFACTO STATES were formed, because new constitutions and new legislatures were formed via the 14th amendment:
Coleman v. Miller, 507 U. S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972 says: ”The legislatures of Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina had rejected the amendment in November and December, 1866. New governments were erected in those States (and in others) under the direction of Congress. The new legislatures ratified the amendment, that of North Carolina on July 4, 1868, that of South Carolina on July 9, 1868, and that of Georgia on July 21, 1868.”
The object of the Civil from 1861 to 1865 was not for the Southern States to be conquered or subjugated, and was not intended to impair the rights of the states:
The House Journal – July 22, 1861. p.123 / Senate Journal – July 25, 1861.p.92 both read, Mr. Crittenden submitted the following resolution, viz: . . .that this war is not waged on their part in any spirit of oppression, or for any purpose of conquest or subjugation, or purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the rights or established institutions of those States, but to defend and maintain the supremacy of the Constitution, and to preserve the Union with all the dignity, equality, and rights of the several States unimpaired; and that as soon as these objects are accomplished the war ought to cease.”
The 14th Amendment created a dual nationality status in which Federal Citizenship status was conjoined with an inseparable State “resident/citizen” status. This formed a new body politic which impaired the original body politic of those who possessed the singular state national and [citizen] status by disenfranchising them from voting. (see notes in III)
III. Dejure vs. Defacto Status
1. Federal Citizenship Versus State Citizenship  a. The term “citizen of the United States” never referred to a unified National form of citizenship, but that of a singular “state” citizenship status until the passage of the 14th Amendment.
“The slaves recently emancipated by proclamation, and subsequently by Constitutional Amendment, have no civil status. They should be made citizens. We do not, by making them citizens, make them voters,—we do not, in this Constitutional Amendment, attempt to force them upon Southern white men as equals at the ballot-box; but we do intend that they shall be admitted to citizenship, that they shall have the protection of the laws, that they shall not, any more than the rebels shall, be deprived of life, of liberty, of property, without due process of law, and that “they shall not be denied the equal protection of the law.”
And in making this extension of citizenship, we are not confining the breadth and scope of our efforts to the negro. It is for the white man as well. We intend to make citizenshipNational. Heretofore, a man has been a citizen of the United States because he was a citizen of some-one of the States: now, we propose to reverse that, and make him a citizen of any State where he chooses to reside, by defining in advance his National citizenship—and our Amendment declares that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” This Amendment will prove a great beneficence to this generation, and to all who shall succeed us in the rights of American citizenship; and we ask the people of the revolted States to consent to this condition as an antecedent step to their re-admission to Congress with Senators and Representatives.”
b. Before the passage of Amend. XIV the United States, for citizenship and nationality purposes, was considered to be a plural collective of separate nations.
1. 2 STAT 153 , An act to establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore  passed on that subject, says “Be it enacted, &c, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them…
2. Amendment XIII. §1. says “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”
c. After the passage of Amend. XIV the United States, for citizenship and nationality purposes, was considered to be a singular entity.
1. 8 USC § 1483 (a) says , Except as provided in paragraphs (6) and (7) of §1481 (a) of this title, no national of the United States can lose United States nationality under this chapter while within the United States or any of its outlying possessions”
d. The language in the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (14 Stat. 27) set the premise for this aforementioned unified National Citizenship as decreed in Amend. XIV.
THE FRAMERS ENACTED by Robert J. Kaczorowski Copyright © 2005 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College Harvard Journal on Legislation (JOL) – Volume 42, Number 1, Winter 2005 says that : “Because the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 are central to the meaning and scope of the Amend. XIV , it is necessary to examine the statute’s provisions. In brief, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 conferred U.S. citizenship on all Americans”
e. There is evidence that the several Union states had power to confer their respective state citizenship before & around the time of the Civil Rights Act and the “citizen of the United States” status written in the Civil Rights Act was only a unified Federal citizenship.
1. March 27, 1866 – Johnson’s Veto of the Civil Rights Act – Senate Journal, p.279: says that,“By the first section of the bill ; ‘all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the United States’. It does not purport to declare or confer any other right of citizenship than federal citizenship. It does not purport to give these classes of persons any status as citizens of States, except that which may result from their status as citizens of the United States. The power to confer the right of State citizenship is just asexclusively with the several States as the power to confer the right of federal citizenship is with Congress.”
2. Ex Parte Knowles 5 Cal. 300 (1855) “A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as use in the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions.
The object then to be obtained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States”
3. Sharon v. Hill, (1885) 26 F 337, 343.”Prior to the adoption of this amendment, strictly speaking, there were no citizens of the United States, but only some one of them. Congress had the power “to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,” but not the power to make a naturalized alien a citizen of any state. But the states generally provided that such persons might, on sufficient residence therein, become citizens thereof, and then the courts held, ab convenienti, rather than otherwise, that they became ipso facto citizens of the United States.
_____End of the Research Report_____
Judge Anna’s further comment:
Anyone who didn’t agree to this cozy arrangement had to expatriate from the presumption of “US citizenship”—- that is, prior to this Unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable mess at the end of the Civil War (which technically never ended because Congress never established a proper Peace Treaty) nobody was presumed to be a citizen of the United States — that is, a “federal citizen” like someone born on Guam.
Afterward, everyone was “presumed” to be a “federal citizen” unless they took action to rebut and overcome that presumption and expatriate to the original natural jurisdiction of the people and the states.
All of the same arguments then apply now.  What began in force and fraud and unconstitutional action undertaken by the 39th and 40th Congresses must be opposed in word and deed and challenged and put to rest once and for all.
We have a contract with the United States and it is not within the powers granted to the United States to violate our Constitution by any claim in commerce or act by a corporate Board of Directors.

See this article and over 300 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Cracking the Code – The Fascinating Truth About Taxation in America

Why are you paying income tax if you don’t have to?

Check Pete’s website:  http://www.losthorizons.com



July 7, 2016    By:  TLB  Staff Writer    David-William

Are we preaching to the choir?  How many of your friends know that Foreign Agent, Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorneys aren’t allowed to hold Offices of trust?  How many know that the constitution is very clear about this?  How many know that the original Article XIII in the Bill of Rights is missing?  Is it really missing?  NO!!!

If a contract is created among those in agreement gets altered by one of the parties, is it still a contract?  NO!  What if the parties are held at gunpoint, under duress and threat of coercion, forced by a Military Coup D’Etat, to sign on to a new de facto corporate contract with a foreign banking conglomerate?  What if the parties involved were not even a lawful, constitutional Congress?  Well, that’s what happened!  

The real constitution has only thirteen Articles in the Bill of Rights.  Originally there were ten.  Three more were added, and that’s all, and Article XIII was the last one, and that’s the one that got left out of the new, fake constitution.  


Look carefully at the photo below!!!  This is the Territory of Wyoming.  The date is 1876.  Article XIII is about “Titles of Nobility.”  Article XIV is about “Slavery.”  Article XV is about the Coup, deceptively known as the “14th” Amendment.  



There it is!  When you look at the constitution that’s published today, it doesn’t look like this, does it?!?  In fact, all the States’ publications listed the real Article XIII, including the States that didn’t vote to ratify it.  Yes, it was ratified, and the proof is extensive.  Just don’t listen to anything that comes from the lips of lying B.A.R. Attorneys.  If you believe anything they say, you’re nuts, sorry.  Trust in the fact that The Liberty Beacon has proven this abundantly.  The specific lie under the spotlight now is that this is not “patriot talk” or nonsense.  The de facto, THE UNITED STATES-The United States-and all derivatives thereof, was created unlawfully and the beast reared it’s head with the unlawful District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871.  

The fact that is was eliminated just a few years later bears the same level of unlawful status as it’s creation.  The municipality was actually created on May 3, 1802, about a week after the Naturalization Act of 1802.  “Municipality” can be accurately characterized as a continuing criminal enterprise, and for those who comprehend what’s being said here, The United States of Rome!  The Territory of Columbia was then and is still today, under the stinking Vatican.  The Zionist-Jesuit run Crown Temple B.A.R., Middle Temple, Inns of the Court, City of London, stinking Pirates called Attorneys/Brokers for the Curia and their Crown – Vatican – Swiss Banking Cabal.  The B.A.R. of the Middle Temple run the Pirate Vessel called UNITED STATES!


A friend of what?  The Court?  Guess again!  The B.A.R. is run by the Jesuits!!!  The lying “Society of Jesus” a.k.a. “Jesus Christ” and no one murdered more Christians than these Devil Worshippers.  Take a lQQk:

“Amicus Curia” – Friend of the Court?
Amicus – Friend, Curia – Vatican
Really they’re B.A.R. occupied, continuing criminal enterprises. There is no lawful or legislative authority for Lawyers or B.A.R. Attorners/Brokers to occupy the courts. The Crown Temple B.A.R. (the Middle Temple occupies The United States), the Inns of the Court, CITY OF LONDON, is a foreign Corporation under FARA, the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

Curia – (Catholic Church) In Roman Catholicism, a curia consists of a group of officials who assist in the governance of a particular Church. These curias range from the relatively simple diocesan curia, to the larger patriarchal curias, to the Roman Curia, which is the central government of the Catholic Church. Other Roman Catholic bodies, such as religious institutes, may also have curias. For example, the Legion of Mary has a rank called the Curia. It stands above the Praesidium but below the Regia. The Curia is responsible for several Praesidia.

These curias are historically descended from the Roman Curiae, and they keep that name even though they now have very different functions. When the Roman Empire collapsed, many of the administrative functions previously done by the state were subsumed by the only solid institution left, which was the church. The Bishop and curia took the place of the government officials, often to the point of actually sitting at the same chair in the same building. The Curia therefore passed into religious hands, and afterwards changed functions many times but always keeping its traditional name, at least in those Christian denominations that keep a strong continuity with the Apostolic tradition.

Diocesan Curia – Every diocese and eparchy has a curia, consisting of the chief officials of the diocese. These officials assist the diocesan bishop in governing the particular church.

This diocesan curia includes the vicar general, who is normally also the moderator of the curia, any episcopal vicars, the chancellor of the curia, vice-chancellors and notaries, and a finance officer and financial council. The bishop may also add other officials of his choice.[1]

Patriarchal Curia – Patriarchates and Major Archiepiscopates of the Eastern Catholic Churches have an assembly called the Patriarchal Curia, which assists the patriarch or major archbishop in administering the sui juris church. The patriarchal curia is distinct from the diocesan or eparchal curia of the patriarch or major archbishop’s diocese or eparchy.

The patriarchal curia consists of the permanent synod of the Church, the chancellor, assistant chancellor, and notaries, the patriarchal finance officer, the patriarchal liturgical commission and other patriarchal commissions, and the patriarchal tribunal.[2] Up to three bishops may be elected specifically to serve in the patriarchal curia.[3]

Roman Curia – The administrative unit of the Holy See is called the Roman Curia, which assists the Pope in governing the Catholic Church.[4] The Roman Curia includes the Secretariats, the Curial Congregations, the Pontifical Councils, Pontifical Commissions, the tribunals, and other offices.

Can. 469—494 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law
Can. 114—125 of the 1990 Code of Canons for the Eastern Churches
Can. 87 of the 1990 Code of Canons for the Eastern Churches.
Code of Canon Law, can. 360

Enough of the truth!  Let’s get back to the lies.  As you read, THE UNITED STATES is run by the Jesuit controlled B.A.R., because it’s not the united states of America, that died back in the 1800s.  It’s THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4, in bankruptcy, with bankruptcy Administrators in Black Robes of Saturn/Satan, like wraiths, Attorneys/Brokers robbing you of your very existence, pretending to be a Nation of the people, by the people, and for the people.  

Let’s take a lQQk at the lying scoundrels from the B.A.R:

(Breitbart) New York federal prosecutor Loretta Lynch, the new nominee for attorney general, has a career filled with high profile cases — and she was a member of Bill Clinton’s defense team during the 1992 Whitewater corruption probe.

As he made his announcement Saturday afternoon, Obama called the two-time U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York a “tough, fair and independent” lawyer.

“It’s pretty hard to be more qualified for this job than Loretta Lynch,” Obama said.

Indeed, the prosecutor has a long career built of some high profile cases but there is one case Lynch was involved in that few are talking about. Lynch was a part of Bill Clinton’s Whitewater probe defense team in 1992.


NYC attorney: “We run the country”
“JANUARY 31, 2016, 4:44 PM | In this 60 Minutes excerpt, Marc Koplik, one of the lawyers filmed by a hidden camera, made some interesting comments about how America works.”


The Ratified Article XIII

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince, or foreign Power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”


On December 2, 1817, Secretary of State, John Quincy Adams wrote a letter to Buck, an Attorney, regarding the position Buck had been assigned:
“If it should be the opinion of this government, that the acceptance on your part of the commission, under which it was granted, did not interfere with your citizenship, it is the opinion of the Executive, that under the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, by the acceptance of such an appointment from any foreign government, a citizen of the united States ceases to enjoy that character, and becomes incapable of holding any Office of Trust or profit under the united States or either of them.” John Quincy Adams


Article XIII put the teeth into this:

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:

“No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”



TLB has other, above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top left of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.

The Liberty Beacon contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Source:   http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/b-a-r-attorneys-are-forbidden-from-office/


Multiple Scientists Confirm The Reality of Free Energy



Who is benefiting from suppressing scientific research? Whose power and wealth is threatened by access to clean and free energy? Who has the desire to create a system where so few have so much, and so many have so little?
It’s become extremely obvious, especially within the past few years, that Earth’s dependence on fossil fuels is not needed at all. Yet we continue to create war, destroy the environment and harm mother Earth so we can continue using the same old techniques that generate trillions of dollars for those at the top of the energy industry. Corporate media continues to push the idea that we are in an energy crisis, that we are approaching a severe problem due to a lack of resources. It’s funny how the same group of shareholders that own the energy industry also own corporate media. This seems to be both another fear tactic and another excuse to create conflict. How can there be a lack of resources when we have systems that can provide energy without any external input? This means that these systems could run for infinity and provide energy to the entire planet without burning fossil fuels. This would eliminate a large portion of the ‘bills’ you pay to live, and reduce the harmful effect we are having on Earth and her environment. Even if you don’t believe in the concept of free energy (also known as zero-point energy), we have multiple clean energy sources that render the entire energy industry obsolete. This article however will focus mainly on the concept of free energy which has been proven time and time again by researchers all across the world who have conducted several experiments and published their work multiple times. A portion of this vast amount of research will be presented in this paper. These concepts have been proven in hundreds of laboratories all over the world, yet never see the light of day. If the new energy technologies were set free world wide the change would be profound. It would affect everybody, it would be applicable everywhere. These technologies are absolutely the most important thing that have happened in the history of the world. – Dr. Brian O’Leary, Former NASA Astronaut and Princeton Physics Professor
The Research These concepts are currently being discussed at The Breakthrough Energy Movement Conference. The Casimir Effect is a proven example of free energy that cannot be debunked. The Casimir Effect illustrates zero point or vacuum state energy, which predicts that two metal plates close together attract each other due to an imbalance in the quantum fluctuations(0)(8). You can see a visual demonstration of this concept here. The implications of this are far reaching and have been written about extensively within theoretical physics by researchers all over the world. Today, we are beginning to see that these concepts are not just theoretical, but instead very practical and simply very suppressed. Vacuums generally are thought to be voids, but Hendrik Casimir believed these pockets of nothing do indeed contain fluctuations of electromagnetic waves. He suggested that two metal plates held apart in a vacuum could trap the waves, creating vacuum energy that could attract or repel the plates. As the boundaries of a region move, the variation in vacuum energy (zero-point energy) leads to the Casimir effect. Recent research done at Harvard University, and Vrije University in Amsterdam and elsewhere has proved the Casimir effect correct (7). A paper published in the Journal Foundations of Physics Letters, in August 2001, Volume 14, Issue 4 shows that the principles of general relativity can be used to explain the principles of the motionless electromagnetic generator (MEG)(1). This device takes electromagnetic energy from curved space-time and outputs about twenty times more energy than inputted. The fact that these machines exist is astonishing, it’s even more astonishing that these machines are not implemented worldwide right now. It would completely wipe out the entire energy industry, nobody would have to pay bills and it would eradicate poverty at an exponential rate. This paper demonstrates that electromagnetic energy can be extracted from the vacuum and used to power working devices such as the MEG used in the experiment. The paper goes on to emphasize how these devices are reproducible and repeatable. The results of this research have been used by numerous scientists all over the world. One of the many examples is a paper written by Theodor C. Loder, III, Professor Emeritus at the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space at the University of New Hampshire. He outlined the importance of these concepts in his paper titled Space and Terrestrial Transportation and Energy Technologies For The 21st Century (2). There is significant evidence that scientists since Tesla have known about this energy, but that its existence and potential use has been discouraged and indeed suppressed over the past half century or more (2) – Dr. Theodor C. Loder III Harold E. Puthoff, an American Physicist and Ph.D. from Stanford University, as a researcher at the institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, Texas published a paper in the journal Physical Review A, atomic, molecular and optical physics titled “Gravity as a zero-point-fluctuation force(3)”. His paper proposed a suggestive model in which gravity is not a separately existing fundamental force, but is rather an induced effect associated with zero-point fluctuations of the vacuum, as illustrated by the Casimir force. This is the same professor that had close connections with Department of Defense initiated research in regards to remote viewing. The findings of this research are highly classified, and the program was instantly shut down not longer after its initiation (4). Another astonishing paper titled “Extracting energy and heat from the vacuum,” by the same researchers, this time in conjunction with Daniel C. Cole, Ph.D. and Associate Professor at Boston University in the Department of Mechanical Engineering was published in the same journal (5). Relatively recent proposals have been made in the literature for extracting energy and heat from electromagnetic zero-point radiation via the use of the Casimir force. The basic thermodynamics involved in these proposals is analyzed and clarified here, with the conclusion that yes, in principle, these proposals are correct (5). Furthermore, a paper in the journal Physical Review A, Puthoff titled “Source of vacuum electromagnetic zero-point energy (6),” Puthoff describes how nature provides us with two alternatives for the origin of electromagnetic zero-point energy. One of them is generation by the quantum fluctuation motion of charged particles that constitute matter. His research shows that particle motion generates the zero-point energy spectrum, in the form of a self-regenerating cosmological feedback cycle. Before commenting on the article, please read the article, look at the sources and watch the video. Many of your questions can be answered there. We come across many who are quick to comment without examining the information presented. This is a clip from the documentary Thrive, you can view the full documentary by clicking on the title.
We’ve had major military people at great risks to themselves say yes these things are real. Why do you think the military industrial complex doesn’t want that statement to be made, because you start thinking about what kind of technology is behind that, that’s the bottom line. – Adam Trombly, Physicist, Inventor
As illustrated multiple times above, the energy these systems use is extracted from the fabric of the space around us. That means it cannot be metered, which creates a threat to the largest industry on the planet, energy. An industry that is partly responsible for the destruction of our planet, and an industry that rakes in hundreds of trillions of dollars every year. No blame is to be given, only a realization is to be made that we have the power to change this anytime we choose. These technologies would completely change everything, but it’s important to remember that operating technology depends on what level of consciousness the operators are operating it at. Is the human race ready for such a transformation? Nothing can work unless the consciousness behind it comes from a place of love, peace, co-operation and understanding. The desire for the benefit of all beings on the planet would be the driving force for the release of these technologies. These technologies are locked up in black budget projects, it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity (2) – Ben Rich, Former Director of Lockheed’s Skunkworks Division I hope I’ve provided enough information here for those interested in furthering their research on the subject. There is a lot to this technology, and it branches into many other areas from ancient history to sacred geometry and all the way to UFOs. The technology described in this paper is similar to what Dr. O’Leary states here with regards to propulsion systems and an isolated field of energy. For more on this subject, please visit our exopolitics section under the alternative news tab as it does correlate with the technology of anti-gravity and free energy
Collective Evolution has covered this topic before. We’ve demonstrated the reality of the Searl Effect Generator. We’ve also written about the Free Energy Devices. This article was simply to provide you with more information and research to show you just how applicable these concepts are and the tremendous implications they can have. Sources: (0) http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v457/n7226/edsumm/e090108-01.html (1) http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1012369318404 (2) http://www.disclosureproject.org/docs/pdf/OutsideTheBox-TedLoderPaper.pdf (3) http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v39/i5/p2333_1 (4)
Related: Nikola Tesla The Secret Movie – Unlimited Free Energy Forever Tesla Hyperloop Train Can Travel At 4000 mph SIRIUS – A Documentary That Can End The Need For Fossil Fuels Terrafugia the World’s first Flying Car Scientists ‘Freeze’ Light For An Entire Minute THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take? (Documentary) Paradise or Oblivion (Documentary) – The Venus Project Credits: Collective Evolution… Read More: http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/10/multiple-scientists-confirm-the-reality-of-free-energy-heres-the-proof.html